期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

不同手术方式对早期乳腺癌患者生存质量的影响 被引量：8

The Effect of Different Surgical Modalities on Quality of Life in Patients with Early Stage Breast Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]比较保乳术与非保乳术对早期乳腺癌患者生存质量的影响。[方法]选取早期乳腺癌患者190例(保留乳房手术102例,改良根治术或根治术88例),用FACT-B(4.0)中文版收集资料,采用t检验比较不同术式对两组患者生存质量的影响。[结果]保乳组与非保乳组患者的总体生存质量无统计学差异(t=1.12,P=0.265)。各领域得分的比较中,保乳组社会/家庭状况领域得分高于非保乳组(t=2.34,P=0.021)。[结论]保乳组与非保乳组患者总体生存质量无显著差异,但保乳组在社会/家庭状况和体像方面优于非保乳组。 [Purpose] To compare the effect of different surgical modalities on quality of life in patients with early stage breast cancer. [Methods I One hundred and ninety patients with early stage breast cancer were enrolled, including 102 patients treated with breast-conserving surgery （BCS） and 88 patients treated with modified radical mastectomy or radical mastectomy （MRM）. Data were collected by FACT-B （4,0） Chinese version. The quality of life between the two groups was compared by t-test. [ Results ] There was no significant difference between BCS and MRM group in the score of total quality of life （t=-1.12,P=0.265）. But in the social/family well- being,the score of the BCS group was higher than that of MRM group （t=-2.34,P=-0.021）.[Conelu sionsl The total quality of life is similar between BCS and MRM group,but in the field of so- cial/family well-being, BCS group is better than MRM group.
作者 童琴 管迅行 何振宇 李凤岩
机构地区 南华大学附属第一医院 中山大学肿瘤防治中心
出处 《肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2014年第4期282-285,共4页 Journal of Chinese Oncology
关键词 生存质量 保留乳房手术 改良根治术 根治术 乳腺肿瘤 quality of life breast-conserving surgery modified radical mastectomy radical mastectomy breast neoplasms
分类号 R737.9 [医药卫生—肿瘤]
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Veronesi U,Cascinelli N,Mariani L,et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer [J]. N Engl J Med,2002,347(16): 1227-1232.
  • 2Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J,et al. Twenty-year follow- up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy,and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treat- ment of invasive breast cancer [J]. N Engl J Med,2002, 347(16) : 1233-1241.
  • 3Li J,Zhang BN,Fan JH,et al. A nation-wide multicenter 10-year (1999-2008) retrospective clinical epidemiological study of female breast cancer in China [J]. BMC Cancer, 2011,22(11) :364-374.
  • 4张保宁,邵志敏,乔新民,李波,姜军,杨名添,王水,宋三泰,张斌,杨红健.中国乳腺癌保乳治疗的前瞻性多中心研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(11):680-684. 被引量：246
  • 5Van der Steeg AF,De Vries J,Roukema JA. Anxious per- sonality and breast cancer:possible negative impact on quality of life after breast-conserving therapy[J]. World J Surg, 2010,34(7): 1453-1460.
  • 6Coequyt VF,Blondeel PN,Depypere HT,et al. Better cos- metic: results and comparable quality of life after skin- sparing masteetomy and immediate autologous breast re- construction compared to breast conservative treatment[J]. Br J Plast Surg,2003,56(5) :462-470.
  • 7de Haes JC,Curran D,Aaronson NK,et al. Quality of life in breast cancer patients aged over 70 years,participating in the EORTC 10850 randomised clinical trial [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2003,39(7) : 945-951.
  • 8Sun Y,Kim SW,Heo CY,et al. Comparison of quality of life based on surgical technique in patients with breast cancer[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2014,44(1 ) : 22-27.
  • 9Steinberg MD,Juliano MA,Wise L. Psychological outcome of lumpectomy versus mastectomy in the treatment of breast cancer[J]. Am J Psychiatry, 1985,142(1):34-39.
  • 10Wapnir IL,Cody RP,Greco RS. Subtle differences in quality of life after breast cancer surgery [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 1999,6(4) : 359-366.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Bedwinek J. Treatment of stage I and Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of the breast by tumor excision and irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1981,7: 1553-1559.
  • 2Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol,2000, 18: 1668-1675.
  • 3Smitt MC, Nowels KW, Zdeblick MJ, et al. The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation. Cancer, 1995,76:259-267.
  • 4Bartelink H, Horiot JC, Poortmans P, et al. Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation. N Engl J Med,2001,345:1378-1387.
  • 5National Institutes of Health. NIH consensus conference on the treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA,1991,265:391-395.
  • 6Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med,2002,347: 1233-1241.
  • 7Liljegren G, Holmberg L, Bergh J, et al. 10-Year results after sector resection with or without postoperative radiotherapy for stage I breast cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol,1999,17:2326-2333.
  • 8Renton SC, Gazet JC, Ford HT, et al. The importance of resection margin in conservative surgery for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol,1996,22:17-22.
  • 9Clark RM, Whelan T, Levine M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of breast irradiation following lumpectomy and axillary dissection for node-negative breast cancer: an update. Ontario Clinical Oncology Group. J Natl Cancer Inst,1996,88:1659-1664.
  • 10Forrest AP, Stewart HJ, Everington D, et al. Randomised controlled trial of conservation therapy for breast cancer: 6-year analysis of the Scottish trial. Scottish Cancer Trials Breast Group. Lancet,1996,348:708-713.

共引文献245

同被引文献48

引证文献8

二级引证文献47

肿瘤学杂志
2014年 第4期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部