期刊文献+

TURP治疗高危前列腺增生症112例报道 被引量:2

TURP for Treatment of High Risk Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia:A Report of 112 Cases
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:总结经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)治疗高危良性前列腺增生症(BPH)患者的临床疗效和安全性。方法对112例高危BPH患者应用经尿道前列腺电切术治疗的临床资料进行分析。结果全部患者均顺利完成手术,手术时间40~110 min,术中出血量平均约80 mL,无输血,无前列腺电切综合征(TURS)发生。随访3~12个月,全部患者术后排尿功能恢复良好,无1例真性尿失禁及继发性出血。国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)由29.6分下降至7.3分,最大尿流率(Qmax)由7 mL/s增至20 mL/s,残余尿量(PVR)由158 mL降至20 mL。治疗前后的IPSS、Qmax、PVR对比,差异有统计学意义。结论对高危BPH患者应用经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)安全有效,个体化的治疗方案及严格的围手术期处理是治疗成功的关键。 Objective To investigate the efficacy and safetyof high risk benign prostate hyperplasia(BPH)treated with TURP. Methods The clinical experiences of TURP treatment in 112 cases of high risk benign prostate hyperplasia were analyzed. Results All operations were performed smoothly.The operating time was 40-110 min, no blood transfusion, no transurethral resection syndrome(TURS). With follow up of 3-12 months,all patients had fluent urination but no urinary incontinence and secondary hemorrhage. The International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS)were decreased from 29.6 to 7.3.Maximal flow rate(Qmax)increased from 7mL/min to 20mL/min. Prostate Volume Reduction(PVR)from 158mL to 20mL .Therewere significant diferenceinIPSS, Qmax ,PVR,between pre-operation and post-operation. Conclusion TURP is a safe and effective therapy to high risk patients with benign prostate hyperplasia. The Individual treatment and systematic treatment during perioperafion are the keys to the success.
出处 《中国医药指南》 2014年第12期31-32,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
关键词 前列腺增生症 高危 经尿道前列腺电切术 Benign prostate hyperplasia High risk TURP
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献22

  • 1吴开俊.中国人前列腺增生症治疗现状与展望[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1993,15:12-4.
  • 2Hans J Reuter.泌尿系内镜手术图谱,第1版[M].郑州:河南科学技术出版社,1989.6-7.
  • 3郭应禄.应用前列腺增生治疗进展[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1993,15:1-3.
  • 4[2]Talic R F. Transurethral electrovaporization-resection of the prostate using the "Wing" cutting electrode: Treatment of safety and efficacy in the outflow obstruction. Urology, 1999, 53:106-110.
  • 5[4]Hancock A, Keoghane S, Tumer K, et al. Two-year date from the Oxford Laser Prostate Trial: a double-blind randomized controlled trial of TURP and contact laser prostatectomy[Abstract]. Br J Urol, 1997, 79:60-60.
  • 6[5]Cetinkaya M, Ulusoy E, Adsan O, et al. Comparative early results of trasurethral electroresection and transurethal electrovaporization in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Br J Urol, 1996, 78:902-903.
  • 7[6]Narayan P, Tewari A, Croker, et al. Factors affecting sizes and configuration of electrovaporization lesions in the prostate. J Urol, 1996, 47:679-688.
  • 8Muscher R,Reich O.Surgical and instrumental management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.Urologe A,2008,47:155-165.
  • 9Roehrborn CG.Definition of at-risk patients:baseline variable.BJU Int,2006,97(Suppl 2):7-11.
  • 10Madersbacher S,Alivizatos G,Nordling J,et al.EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment,therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction(BPH guidelines).Eur Urol,2004,46:547-554.

共引文献209

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部