期刊文献+

Josephson current versus potential strength of the interface in ferromagnetic superconductors

Josephson current versus potential strength of the interface in ferromagnetic superconductors
原文传递
导出
摘要 Based on the scattering theory, we calculate the Josephson current in a junction between two ferromagnetic super-conductors as a function of the interface potential z. We consider the ferromagnetic superconductor (FS) in three different Cooper pairing states: spin singlet s-wave pairing (SWP) state, spin triplet opposite spin pairing (OSP) state, and spin triplet equal spin pairing (ESP) state. We find that the critical Josephson current as a function of z shows clear differences among the SWP, OSP, and ESP states. The obtained results can be used as a useful tool for determining the pair symmetry of the ferromagnetic superconductors. Based on the scattering theory, we calculate the Josephson current in a junction between two ferromagnetic super-conductors as a function of the interface potential z. We consider the ferromagnetic superconductor (FS) in three different Cooper pairing states: spin singlet s-wave pairing (SWP) state, spin triplet opposite spin pairing (OSP) state, and spin triplet equal spin pairing (ESP) state. We find that the critical Josephson current as a function of z shows clear differences among the SWP, OSP, and ESP states. The obtained results can be used as a useful tool for determining the pair symmetry of the ferromagnetic superconductors.
机构地区 Department of Physics
出处 《Chinese Physics B》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2014年第5期537-541,共5页 中国物理B(英文版)
基金 Project supported by the Iran National Science Foundation(INSF)
关键词 ferromagnetic superconductors spin singlet s-wave pairing state spin triplet opposite spin pairingstate spin triplet equal spin pairing state ferromagnetic superconductors, spin singlet s-wave pairing state, spin triplet opposite spin pairingstate, spin triplet equal spin pairing state
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Josephson B D 1965 Adv. Phys. 14 419.
  • 2Josephson B D 1964 Rev. Mod. Phys. 36 216.
  • 3Saxena S S, Agarwal P, Ahilan K, Grosche F M, Haselwimmer R K W, Steiner M J, Pugh E, Walker I R, Julian S R, Monthoux P, Lonzarich G G, Huxley A, Shelkin I, Braithwaite D and Flouquet J 2000 Nature 406 587.
  • 4Pfleiderer C, Uhlarz M, Hayden S M, Vollmer R, Lohneysen H V, Bernhoeft N R and Lonzarich G G 2001 Nature 412 58.
  • 5Aoki D, Huxley A, Ressouche E, Braithwaite D, Flouquet J, Brison J, Lhotel E and Paulsen C 2001 Nature 413 613.
  • 6Dahal H P, Jackiewicz J and Bedell K S 2005 Phys. Rev. B 72 172506.
  • 7Kotegawa H, Harada A, Kawasaki S, Kawasaki Y, Kitaoka Y, Haga Y, Yamamoto E, Onuki Y, Itoh K M, Haller E E and Harima H 2005 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74 705.
  • 8Blagoev K B, Engelbrecht J R and Bedell K S 2003 Philos. Mag. Lett. 78 169.
  • 9Abrikosov A 2001 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 13 L943A.
  • 10Suhl H 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 167007.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部