期刊文献+

腹腔镜下腹膜透析置管术与开腹手术的疗效及安全性比较 被引量:8

The Comparision of Efficacy and Safety between Laparoscopic and Conventional Placement of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:比较腹腔镜下腹膜透析(PD)置管术与开腹手术的疗效和安全性。方法:选取上海市第八人民医院肾内科、上海市东方医院肾内科自2010年10月至2012年10月愿意接受PD治疗的终末期肾病患者共28例,采用患者自愿选择方法,分为开腹手术组(A组)和腹腔镜组(B组),记录手术患者术前基本情况,手术时间、术中出血量,术后疼痛时间、下床活动时间、腹腔出血、伤口感染和腹膜粘连等术后并发症以及腹膜透析相关并发症等情况。结果:腹腔镜组手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛时间、下床活动时间、腹腔出血、伤口感染和腹膜粘连等并发症明显优于开腹手术组(P均<0.05)。随访2年内,A组腹膜炎发生率为15%,高于B组的12.5%,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.608)。B组无出口隧道感染和渗漏等并发症发生,而A组各有1例发生(P均<0.01)。A组有3例导管移位和2例引流不畅发生,而B组没有,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:与常规开腹手术相比较,腹腔镜腹膜透析置管术创伤小、并发症少、术后患者康复快,发生导管移位率、引流不畅率显著降低,是改善腹膜透析置管手术风险和减少并发症的较理想的手术方式。 Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety between laparoscopic and conventional place-ment of peritoneal dialysis(PD) catheter in patients with end-stage renal disease(ESRD).Method:28 pa-tients were selected as candidates ,who received catheter implantation and PD therapy from October 2010 to October 2012 in shanghai No 8 peopole hospital and shanghai dongfang hospital .They were randomly divided into two group A(with conventional placement of PD catheter ,n=30) and group B(with laparoscopic place-ment of PD catheter,n=21).The clinical characteristic,surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain time, bed time, abdominal bleeding ,wound infection peritoneal adhesion ,and complications associated with PD were observed .Result:The complications such as the surgery time , intraoperative blood loss , post-operative pain time , bed time , abdominal bleeding ,, wound infection peritoneal adhesion in group B were better significantly than those in group A ( P&lt;0.05) .In 2 years of follow-up,the total incidence of peritonitis was 13.3%in group A and 9.9%in group B, and there was no significant difference statistically (P=0.608). There were no complications with exit/tunnel infection and peritoneal leak in group B ,while 1 case in group A respectively(P&lt;0.01).There were 3 cases with PD catheter shift and no-free drainage in group A,while 1 case in group B ( P&lt;0.05,respectively ) .Conclusion:With comparision to conventional placement of perito-neal dialysis cathters ,laparoscopic placement had advantages such as smaller trauma ,decreased complications and shorter postoperative recovery time .Through the beneficial decreasement of PD catheter shift and drain-age,the laparoscopic placement of PD catheters is an ideal operation method for peritoneal dialysis .
出处 《河北医学》 CAS 2014年第4期562-566,共5页 Hebei Medicine
关键词 腹膜透析 腹腔镜检查 腹膜炎 并发症 Peritoneal dialysis Laparoscopy Peritonitis Complication
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Xie H, Zhang W, Cheng J, He Q.Laparoscopic versus open cafiieter placement in peritoneal dialysis patients: a system- atic review and meta-analysis [ J ]. BMC Nephrot, 2012, 13(27) :69.
  • 2Gajjar AH, Rhoden DH, Kathuria P,et al.Peritoneal dialy- sis catheters : [aparoseopic versus traditional placement tech- niques and outcomes [ J ]. Am Surg, 2007,194 (6) : 872 - 875.
  • 3Eklund B, Groop PH, Halme L, et al.Peritoneal dialysis ac- cess: a comparison of peritoneosccpic and surgical insertion techniques [ J ]. Scand Urol Nephro!, 1998,32 ( 6 ) : 405-408.
  • 4Gadallah MF, Pervez A, el-Shahawy MA, et al.Peritoneo- scopie versus surgical placement of peritoneal dialysis cathe- ters: a prospective randomized study on outcome [ J ]. Am Kidney Dis, 1999,33( 1 ) : 118-122.
  • 5Caliskan K, Nursal TZ, Tarim AM, et al. The adequacy of laparoscopy hr continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis procc, durcs[ J] .Transplant Proc,2007,39(5) : 1359-1361.

同被引文献61

引证文献8

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部