期刊文献+

董事会特征与公司代理成本间的动态关系——基于动态内生性的经验研究

The Dynamics Relationship Between Board Characteristics and Corporate Agency Costs
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以410家上市公司2002~2011年10年数据为样本,在动态内生性的框架下,运用动态面板的SystemGMM估计方法,同时考虑了三种内生性,以动态性的视角研究了董事会特征与公司代理成本间的动态关系。通过研究,我们发现:(1)董事会特征不仅对当期代理成本有显著的影响,而且对下一期代理成本也有显著的影响,董事会特征对代理成本存在长期影响;(2)前期代理成本对当期董事会特征有反馈效应;(3)董事会特征与代理成本间存在动态内生性;(4)代理成本在董事会特征与公司绩效间起不同的中介效应。 In this paper, 410 listed companies range from 2002 to 2011 are used as our sample. In the frame- work of dynamic endogeneity, we use the dynamic System GMM model, taking into account three kinds of en- dogeneity at the same time, based on a dynamic perspective to study the relationship between board character- istics and corporate agency costs. And we get the following results: (a) Not only board characteristics affect current agency costs, but also has an effect on the next period agency costs, board characteristics has a long period effect on agency costs; (b)Previous corporate agency costs produces a feedback effect on current board characteristics; (c) Dynamics endogeneity between board characteristics and agency costs is really exist; (d) Agency costs has a different intermediary effect between board characteristics and corporate performance.
出处 《郑州航空工业管理学院学报》 2014年第2期43-53,共11页 Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics
关键词 董事会特征 公司代理成本 动态内生性 board characteristics corporate agency costs dynamic endogeneity
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Jensen M C, Meckling W H. Theory of the firm : Manag- erial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure [ J ]. Journal of financial economics, 1976,3 (4) : 305 - 360.
  • 2Roberts M, Whited T. Endogeneity in Empirical Corpo- rate Finance. forthcoming in George Constantinides, Mil- ton Harris, and Rene Stulz, eds. Handbook of the Eco- nomics of Finance[ Z]. 2012.
  • 3Wintoki M B, Linck J S, Netter J M. Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance [ J ]. Jour- nal of Financial Economics,2012,105 (3) :581 - 606.
  • 4Schuhz E L, Tan D T, Walsh K D. Endogeneity and the corporate governance -performance relation [ J ]. Austral- ian journal of Management, 2010,35 (2) : 145 - 163.
  • 5Fama E F, Jensen M C control [ J ]. Journal of Separation of ownership and law and economics, 1983,26 (2) :301 -325.
  • 6Coles J, Daniel N, Naveen L. Co - opted boards : costs, benefits, causes, and consequences [ D ]. Unpublished working paper. Arizona State University, Drexel Univer- sity and Temple University, 2007.
  • 7叶康涛,祝继高,陆正飞,张然.独立董事的独立性:基于董事会投票的证据[J].经济研究,2011,46(1):126-139. 被引量:322
  • 8解维敏,唐清泉.公司治理与风险承担——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].财经问题研究,2013(1):91-97. 被引量:101
  • 9Jensen M C. The modem industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems [ J ]. The Journal of Finance, 1993, 48(3) : 831 -880.
  • 10Linck J S, Netter J M, Yang T. The determinants of board structure [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2008,87 ( 2 ) : 308 - 328.

二级参考文献224

共引文献1290

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部