期刊文献+

高频振荡通气治疗在重症新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的应用 被引量:21

High frequency oscillatory ventilation in treatment of serious neonatal respiratory distress syndrome
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨高频振荡通气(HFOV)治疗重症新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的疗效及安全性。方法 18例重症RDS患儿在常频通气治疗过程中,出现以下情况采用HFOV治疗:吸入氧浓度≥0.8、平均气道压≥10 cmH2O持续4 h以上,经皮血氧饱和度(SpO2)仍不能稳定在85%以上者;X线胸片提示肺透明膜病变在Ⅲ级以上或合并有肺气漏、肺动脉高压者。结果经HFOV治疗后,18例患儿肤色渐转红,1.5 h内SpO2≥90%,12 h后患儿吸入氧浓度(FiO2)、氧合指数(OI)、平均气道压(MAP)、动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)与HFOV前比较改善明显,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。所有患儿均成功撤机并存活出院。总机械通气时间平均为95.8 h,其中HFOV时间平均为39.7 h。治疗过程中心率、血压无明显变化。结论 HFOV用于治疗重症RDS安全有效。 Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of high frequency oscillatory ventilation in the treatment of serious neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.Methods Eighteen cases of children with serious neonatal respiratory distress syndrome were treated by conventional mechanical ventilation(CMV),and the following appeared in the process of using HFOV treatment:the inhaled oxygen con-centration was 0.8 or higher,mean airway pressure 10 or more cmH2 O lasted more than 4 hours,transcutaneous oxygen saturation was still not stable at 85% above;X-ray suggested pulmonary hyaline membrane disease above the level III or combined with pulmonary gas leakage,pul-monary hypertension.Results During 12 hours after initiating HFOV,the FiO2,oxygen index (OI),mean airway pressure (MAP)and Pa CO2 reduced significantly.All children were successfully withdrawn machine and lived out of the hospital.Total mechanical ventilation time averaged 95.8 h,and HFOV time averaged 39.7 h.No significant cardiac complication was observed.Conclusion HFOV is safe and effec-tive in the treatment of serious neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.
出处 《安徽医学》 2014年第3期326-328,共3页 Anhui Medical Journal
关键词 呼吸窘迫综合征 高频通气 新生儿 High frequency oscillatory ventilation Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome Neonate
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献42

  • 1黄绮薇,张宇鸣,张国琴,滕国良,裘刚.高频通气治疗重症新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征[J].中华儿科杂志,2001,39(1):7-10. 被引量:10
  • 2邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M].第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:872.
  • 3Gajic O, Dara SI, Mendez JL, Adesanya AO, Festic E, Caples SM, et al. Ventilator-associated lung injury in patients without acute lung injury at the onset of mechanical ventilation [ J ]. Crit Care Med, 2004, 32(9) : 1817-1824.
  • 4Wolthuis EK, Vlaar AP, Choi G, Roelofs JJ, Haitsma JJ, van der Poll T, et al. Mechanical ventilation using non-injurious ventilation settings causes lung injury in the absence of pre-existing lung injury in healthy mice[J]. Crit Care, 2009, 13(1) : R1.
  • 5Eichenwald EC. High frequency oscillatory ventilation:is equivalence with conventional mechanical ventilation enough? [J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2006, 91 (5) : F315-F317.
  • 6Downar J, Mehta S. Bench-to-bedside review: high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Crit Care, 2006, 10(6) : 240.
  • 7Courtney SE, Asselin JM. High-frequency jet and oscillatory ventilation for neonates: which strategy and when? [ J ]. Respir Care Clin N Am, 2006,12(3) : 453-467.
  • 8Datin-Dorriere V, Walter-Nicolet E, Rousseau V, Taupin P, Benachi A, Parat S, et al. Experience in the management of eighty-two newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia treated with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and delayed surgery without the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ J ]. J Intensive Care Med, 2008, 23(2):128-135.
  • 9Cools F, Henderson-Smart DJ, Offringa M, Askie LM. Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants [ J ]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2009, (3) :CD000104.
  • 10R. Plavka, P. Kopecky, V. Sebron, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of conventional mechanical ventilation and very early high frequency oscillatory ventilation in extremely premature newborn with respiratory distress syndrome[J ]. Intensive Care

共引文献237

同被引文献134

  • 1刘芳,赵时敏,王丹华.高频通气应用研究进展[J].中华儿科杂志,2001,39(1):62-64. 被引量:2
  • 2常立文.新生儿支气管肺发育不良诊治进展[J].临床儿科杂志,2007,25(3):161-165. 被引量:46
  • 3邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿学.第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011.
  • 4Cools F,Henderson-Smart DJ,Offringa M,et al.Elective highfrequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants.Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2009,3;CD000104.
  • 5Durand DJ,Asselin JM,Hudak ML,et al.Early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in very low birth weight infants:a pilot study of two ventilation protocols.J Perinatol,2001,21:221-229.
  • 6Pinzon AD,Rocha TS,Ricachinevsky C,et al.High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in children with acute respiratory distress syndrome:experience of a pediatric intensive care unit.Rev Assoc Med Bras,2013,59:368-374.
  • 7Moriette G,Paris-Llado J,Walti H,et al.Prospective randomized multicenter comparison of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional ventilation in preterm infants of less than 30 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome.Pediatrics,2001,107:363-372.
  • 8Courtney SE,Durand DJ,Asselin JM,et al.High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very-low-birth-weight infants.N Engl JMed,2002,347:643-652.
  • 9Johnson AH,Peacock JL,Greenough A,et al.High-freuency oscillatory ventilation for the prevention of chronic lung disease of prematurity.N Engl J Med,2002,347:633-642.
  • 10Sun H,Cheng R,Kang W,et al.High-freuency oscillatory ventilation versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation plus pressure support in preterm infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome.Respir Care,2014,59:159-169.

引证文献21

二级引证文献140

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部