摘要
基于行动者的角色扮演及其互动关系,本文比较分析了蓬莱19-3溢油事件中渔民环境抗争的理想路径与现实路径。研究发现,在理想路径中,作为公共利益的维护者和权责裁定者,以国家海洋局和地方海事法院等为代表的公诉方的公正是渔民维权实现的核心;但在现实路径中,责任方的强势自我认定和公诉方的执法角色失位是渔民环境抗争受阻的双重阻碍。渔民环境抗争实现的理想路径构建,关键在于建立和完善确保公诉方公正执法、责任方依法履责和中立方客观中立相关的制度法规及其社会环境。
Based on the roles of its activists, this article makes a comparative analysis to the ideal path and practical path of Fishermen＇s environmental protest in Penglai 19-3 Oil Spill Incident. We find that in the ideal path, the justice of public prosecutors, who as the defenders of public interests and the adjudicator of responsibility were represented by the State Oceanic Administration Bureau and local Maritime Court, was at the core of fisher- men＇s implementing their interests. On the other hand, in the practical path, there were dual barriers hindering fishermen from protecting their interests ： the strong self-identification of responsible party and the role-absence of public prosecution. Thus we conclude that the key to the establishment of ideal path in fishermen＇s environmental protests is to establish and complete the associative system and social environment, ensuring the public prosecutors to enforce the impartial law, the responsible party to carry out its responsibility, and the neutral party to remain its impersonality and neutrality.
出处
《南京工业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2014年第1期104-114,共11页
Journal of Nanjing Tech University：Social Science Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目(13CSH039)
关键词
环境抗争
蓬莱19-3溢油事件
自我认定
角色失位
environmental protest
Penglai 19-3 Oil Spill Incident
self-identification
role-absence
