期刊文献+

中国古代经典联盟思想论纲 被引量:6

An Outline of the Chinese Ancient Classical Alliance Thought
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 春秋战国时期,先秦思想家对诸侯国之间频繁的联盟行为进行了仔细观察和认真思考,这些思考构成中国古代经典联盟思想的核心内容。中国古代经典联盟思想既有在有关联盟功能、联盟生成等方面与现代西方联盟理论相一致的地方,又有在联盟的目的性以及"非"联盟思想方面显示着中国文化特性和价值追求的独到认识。与现代西方联盟理论相比较,前者赋予联盟行为以极强的道德意味,并已高度内化于中国的联盟实践中;后者则更重视联盟对"均势"的影响。前者主要从抽象的道德角度论述联盟的目的和价值,后者则是用工具理性去看待联盟行为与联盟现象的;前者虽然提出"非"联盟的思想观念,但并未给出除"自强"与"中立"之外其他更具想象力的实践方案,后者虽没有实质性地论及该问题,但却在理论上给出了有可能超越联盟政治的某种实践路径。中国古代经典联盟思想最终虽未像西方联盟思想那样发展成完备的理论形态,但依然以丰富的思想性和对后世中国的深刻影响彰显了自身价值。 In the Spring and Autumn period and the Warring States period, preQin thinkers carefully and seriously observed and reflected on the frequent behavior of alliance among vassal states, and this thinking is the core content of the Chinese ancient classical alliance thought. The aspects of alliance function and alliance generation of the Chinese ancient classical alliance thought are consistent with modern Western alliance theory, and the purpose of the alliance and non-alliance thought shows a unique understanding of the characteristics of Chinese culture and value pursuit. This thinking had not developed into a complete theory as some Western union thought did, but still, with its rich ideological content and the profound influence on later China, it highlighted its own historical value.
作者 张鸿石
出处 《国际安全研究》 2013年第6期38-56,151,共19页 Journal of International Security Studies
关键词 中国古代经典思想 联盟思想 春秋战国 道德目标 China classic alliance thought
  • 相关文献

参考文献47

  • 1王文锦.礼记译解(上)[M]北京:中华书局,200148.
  • 2阮元.十三经注疏[M]北京:中华书局,19801266.
  • 3黎翔凤;梁运华.管子校注(上)[M]北京:中华书局,2004471.
  • 4黎翔凤;梁运华.管子校注(上)[M].
  • 5黎翔凤;梁运华.管子校注(上)[M].
  • 6司马迁;[宋]裴驷;[唐]司马贞;[唐]张守节.史记[M]北京:中华书局,19592131.
  • 7郭丹;程小青;李彬源.左传[M]北京:中华书局,2012129.
  • 8刘向;范祥雍;范邦瑾.战国策笺证[M]上海:上海古籍出版社,20061428-1429.
  • 9刘向;范祥雍;范邦瑾.战国策笺证[M]上海:上海古籍出版社,2006787-788.
  • 10刘向;范祥雍;范邦瑾.战国策笺证[M].

二级参考文献72

  • 1秦亚青,魏玲.结构、进程与权力的社会化——中国与东亚地区合作[J].世界经济与政治,2007(3):7-15. 被引量:93
  • 2黄光国.《人情与面子:中国人的权力游戏》[A].黄光国编.《中国人的权力游戏》[C].台北:巨流图书公司,1988年版..
  • 3Kenneth Boulding, Three Faces of Power, Newbury Park, California: Sage, 1990.
  • 4亚历山大·温特.《国际政治的社会理论》.第7章.
  • 5Mustafa Emirbayer, " Manifesto for a Relational Sociology, " American Journal of Sociology, vol.103, no. 2, 1997, pp. 281-317.
  • 6Patrick Thaddeus Jackson and Daniel H. Nexon, "Relations before States; Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics, " pp. 291-332.
  • 7Patrick Thaddeus Jackson, "Relational Constructivism; A War of Words, " in Jennifer Sterling-Folker, ed., Making Sense of International Relations Theory, Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner, 2006, pp. 139-155.
  • 8Steve Smith, "New Approaches to International Theory, " in John Baylis and Steve Smith, eds.,The Globalization of World Politics, New York: Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 186.
  • 9Review of International Studies, vol. 26, no. 1, 2000, pp. 123-180.
  • 10D. Y. F. Ho and C. Y. Chiu, "Collective Representations as a Metaconstruct; An Analysis Based on Methodological Relationalism, " Culture and Psychology, vol. 4, no. 3, 1998, pp. 349-369.

共引文献253

同被引文献72

引证文献6

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部