期刊文献+

不同麻醉方法在经尿道前列腺电切术中的安全有效性对比 被引量:4

Safety and Effectiveness Comparision of Different Methods of Anesthesia in Transurethral Resection of the Prostate
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:分析不同麻醉方法在经尿道前列腺电切术中的安全有效性。方法:选取在我院行经尿道前列腺电切术患者68例为研究对象,ASA为Ⅱ-Ⅲ。随机分为对照组和研究组,分别实施腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)和硬膜外麻醉(EA)下实施经尿道前列腺电切术,对比起效时间,麻醉效果,并发症的发生。结果:腰硬联合醉麻(CSEA)效果优于硬膜外麻醉(EA),差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05),均无不良反应。结论:腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)与硬膜外麻醉(EA)相比,起效快,效果较好,并发症少,在经尿道前列腺电切术中可广泛推广使用。 Objective:Analysis of different anesthesia methods on the safety and effectiveness of transurethral resection of the prostate.Methods:In our hospital in selection of transurethral resection of the prostate patients 68 patients as the research object, ASAⅡ-Ⅲ. Were randomly divided into study group and control group, respectively, the implementation of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) and epidural anesthesia (EA) implementation of transurethral resection of the prostate, onset time, anesthesia effect comparison, complications.Results:In the combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) was better than epidural anesthesia (EA), the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05), there was no adverse reaction.Conclusion:In combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) and epidural anesthesia (EA), fast, good effect, less complications, in transurethral resection of the prostate can be widely used.
作者 粟玉松
出处 《中国医药导刊》 2014年第1期26-26,28,共2页 Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词 腰硬联合麻醉 硬膜外麻醉 前列腺电切术 镇痛效果 对比观察 Combined spinal epidural anesthesia(CSEA) Epidural anesthesia Transurethral resection of the prostate Analgesic effect Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献24

共引文献142

同被引文献34

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部