期刊文献+

案外因素对催生刑事冤案的作用力分析——以美国1188件冤案的结构性分布与案外成因为参鉴 被引量:8

Analysis of External Factors Leading to Wrongful Convictions: From the Structural Categorization and External Factors of 1,188 Wrongful Convictions in America
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 司法刑事体制内原因并非导致刑事冤案的决定性因素,从刑事冤案的结构性分布观察,凶杀案等暴力性犯罪更易于产生冤案。中美两国洗冤机制的实效存在相似之处,例如冤案的结构性分布、证据审查标准以及无辜者洗冤的低成功率等方面。从美国冤案的实际原因来看,案外因素对司法过程的渗透过程不可低估。中国式冤案主要是公共政策、国民对犯罪的基本立场、错误的司法理念、实践中的潜规则、设证式证明的混用等诸多因素综合作用的结果。 All kinds of wrongful convictions are not mainly because of the legal holes or fault of criminal system itself, only if we reconsider the distribution and rate among the false convictions. In fact, wrongful convictions are produced especially in murder cases and rape crime. Crime myths, complicate relations between democratic politics and litigation psychology may have much more effects than rules in legality. Virtually, it is as same as factual results if innocent prisoner appeal after false conviction whether in China or in America although wrongful convictions lead to much additional cost. The causes of Chinese wrongful convictions which lead to innocent people into prison or penalty death are not completely same comparing with American criminal justice. Public policy, crime myths and proof of abduction and political justice process may explain the key reasons in sentencing innocent defendant wrongful conviction.
作者 刘磊
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期152-165,共14页 Modern Law Science
基金 教育部2011年度基金资助项目"刑事诉讼中的软法研究"(11YJC820070)
关键词 案外因素 公共政策 犯罪迷思 设证证明 刑事冤案 public policy crime myths proof of abduction wrongful conviction
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1John Woods. Abduction and Proof: A Criminal Par- adox[ J]. Springger Science,2010:218.
  • 2吉姆·佩特罗,南希·佩特罗.冤案何以发生-导致冤假错案的八大司法迷信[M].苑宁宁,陈效,等,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2013:284,303.
  • 3Daniel S. Medwed. Anatomy of a Wrongful Convic- tion: Theoretical Implications and Practical Solutions [ J ]. Vill. L. Rev. ,2006:337-339.
  • 4Fred E. Markowitz, Paul E Bellair, Allen E. Lis- ka, Liu Jianhong. Extending Social Disorganization Theory: Modeling the Relationships between Cohesion, Disorder, and Fear[ J]. Criminology,2001, (39) :293 - 314.
  • 5熊秋红.冤案防范与权利保障[J].法学论坛,2010,25(4):33-38. 被引量:13
  • 6斯蒂芬·E.巴坎.犯罪学:社会学的理解[M].秦晨,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2011:38.
  • 7孙长永,王彪.刑事诉讼中的“审辩交易”现象研究[J].现代法学,2013,35(1):125-138. 被引量:39
  • 8美国《爱国者法案》203条b项.
  • 9谢志明.美国无罪案件研究报告摘要[J].检察会讯,2002,(81):13-14.
  • 10Stephen J. Schulhofer. Plea Bargaining as Disaster [J]. Yale L.J. ,1979,(101):19Sl -1987.

二级参考文献202

共引文献662

同被引文献125

  • 1陈瑞华.程序性制裁制度的法理学分析[J].中国法学,2005(6):150-163. 被引量:103
  • 2刘慧英,任东来.能动还是克制:一场尚无结果的美国司法辩论——评《司法能动主义》[J].美国研究,2005,19(4):142-148. 被引量:15
  • 3Yale Kamisar, How Earl Warren' s Twenty-Two Years in Law Enforcement Affected His Work as Chief Justice, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 3 ( 2005 ) , pp. 11 - 12.
  • 4Lawrence M. Friedman, Crime and Punishment in A- merican H/story,New York: Basic Books, 1993, p. 295.
  • 5王兆鹏著.《美国刑事诉讼法》,台湾元照出版公司2007年版,第2-3页.
  • 6Mark Tushnet, Observations on the New Revolution in Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Georgetown Law Review, Vol. 94(2006), pp. 1627 - 1628.
  • 7William J. Stuntz, The Uneasy Relationship between Criminal Procedure and Criminal Jus- tice,Yale Law Journal, Vol. 107, Issue 1 (October 1997) , pp. 1 -54.
  • 8美国1791年《权利法案》第四修正案.
  • 9Wayne R. LaFave, Jerold H. Israel & Nancy J. King, Criminal Procedure ( Fourth Edition) , West Thomson(2004) , pp. 58 - 63.
  • 10Donald A. Dripps, The Fourteenth Amendment, the Bill of Rights, and the (First) Criminal Procedure Revolu- tion, Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, Vol. 18 ( 2009 ), p. 477.

引证文献8

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部