摘要
对西汉四家诗的评说,代有异义。魏源在《诗古微》中,提出了以时间早晚、得《诗》的本义还是旁义来评价其得失的观念。他认为,三家诗早于《毛诗》,得作者的本义,而《毛诗》晚于三家诗,得《诗》之旁义,本义高于旁义,故三家诗高于《毛诗》。此说具有还原《诗》的文学本色及重情、崇情的时代价值。但是,魏源之说充满经学与文学、重本义还是重旁义的矛盾,所以,他又提出齐、鲁、韩、毛同轨合辙的说法。
Scholars of different times have voiced different opinions of the four schools of Poetry in Western Han. Wei Quan, in his Interpreting Ancient Poetry （gushi wei）, proposed to evaluate the four schools on the basis of the time of their emergence and whether they grasp the original meaning or the extended meaning. He believed that the Qi, Lu and Han poetry, earlier than the Mao school, get the original meaning of the Poetry, and so they are better than the Mao poetry, which appeared later and got only the extended meaning. His idea helps re-emphasize the Poetry as a literary work of expressing strong human emotions. However, Wei Yuan＇s evaluation did not resolve many contradictions, and he had to conclude that all four schools share the same track and led to the same destination.
出处
《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第2期39-48,共10页
Journal of Sichuan University：Philosophy and Social Science Edition
基金
2013年国家社科基金项目"清代今文经学新论"(13BZX046)
关键词
魏源
评说
四家诗
Wei Yuan, evaluation, the four schools of Poetry
