期刊文献+

终极产权控制下的私利行为及其治理——基于异质控制机制的研究述评 被引量:7

Private Benefits Behavior and Its Governance under the Control of Ultimate Ownership——Based on the Review of Heterogeneous Control Mechanisms
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 有学者通过追溯产权控制路径研究,发现很多国家的上市公司受到终极控股股东的控制。终极控股股东通常通过金字塔股权结构、交叉持股和优先表决权的一股多票等方式实际控制着上市公司,对公司行使不对称的控制权与所有权,从而引起控制权私利行为等代理问题。文章从终极产权控制理论发展脉络出发,重点梳理和总结了双重股权结构、金字塔股权结构和交叉持股等三种异质终极产权控制机制下的控制权私利行为及其治理途径。 Some scholars find that the listed companies are controlled by ultimate controlling shareholders in many countries by the research on tracing back the control paths of ownership. The ultimate controlling shareholders actually control the list-ed companies by way of a stock with multiple voting rights, such as the pyramid ownership structure, cross-shareholdings and priority right to vote, etc. They exercise asymmetric control and ownership on the companies, and can cause agency prob-lems, such as private benefits behavior of control. Based on the development context of ultimate ownership control theory, the paper focuses on sorting out and summarizing private benefits behavior of control and its governance approaches under three heterogeneous control mechanisms of ultimate ownership, which are the dual ownership structure, the pyramid owner-ship structure and cross-shareholdings.
出处 《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 2014年第4期1-6,共6页 East China Economic Management
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(71232004) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71172082 70902030 71372137) 教育部人文社会科学基金项目(09YJC630242) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(CDJSK11002)
关键词 终极产权 异质控制机制 控制权私利 股权结构 ultimate ownership heterogeneous control mechanisms private benefits of control shareholding structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献45

  • 1La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A. Corporate Own?ership around the World[J].Journal of Finance, 1999,54 (2):471-517.
  • 2Claessens S,Djankov S,Lang L H P. The Separation of Own?ership and Control in East Asian CorporationsJ J].Journal of Financial Economics , 2000, 58( 1/2): 81-112.
  • 3Faccio M, Lang L H P. The Ultimate Ownership of Western European Corporations[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 2002,65(3):365-395.
  • 4Bebchuk LA, Kraakman R, Triantis G. Stock Pyramids, Cross-Ownership, and Dual Class Equity:The Creation and Agency Costs of Separating Control from Cash Flow Rights[J]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 200 1 , 30 (5) : 26-63.
  • 5Lemmon M L, Lins K V. Ownership structure, corporate gov?ernance, and firm value: Evidence from the East Asian finan?cial crisis[J]. TheJournal of finance, 2003, 58 (4) : 1445-1468.
  • 6Poletti HughesJ. Ultimate control and corporate value: evi?dence from the UK[J]. Financial Reporting, Regulation and Governance, 2005 ,4(2): 1-23.
  • 7Poletti HughesJ. Corporate value, ultimate control and law protection for investors in Western Europe[J]. Management Accounting Research, 2009, 20( 1) : 41-52.
  • 8La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, et al. Investor protection and corporate governanceJ J].Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, 58( 1) :3-27.
  • 9Johnson S, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, et al. Tunneling[J]. American Economic Review,2000,90(2):22-27.
  • 10Berle E, Means G. The Modem Corporation and Privation Propertyj M], New York: The Macmillan Company, 1932.

共引文献151

同被引文献110

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部