期刊文献+

尿源性脓毒症休克血流动力学特点和预后的临床分析 被引量:4

Hemodynamic characteristics and prognosis of patients with uroseptic shock
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的了解尿源性脓毒症休克的血流动力学特点及预后。方法选取尿源性脓毒症休克患者30例,同期其他脓毒症休克患者30例作为对照组。比较两组患者早期液体复苏治疗后6h和1 2h的血流动力学参数,24h复苏所需液体正平衡量,病程需去甲肾上腺素总量,心脏和肾脏损伤情况及28d病死率。结果与对照组比较,研究组的6、12h的CVP、MAP、ScvO_2明显升高、SVV明显下降(P<0.05)。研究组第1个24h复苏液体正平衡总量较对照组少,心肌损伤发生率和急性肾功能损伤发生率较对照组明显增加(P<0.05),需要去甲肾上腺素维持的总量较对照组多,28d病死率较对照组明显升高(P<0.05)。结论尿源性脓毒症休克患者早期具有心肌损伤,急性肾功能损伤发生率高,对容量复苏接受能力差,易发生心功能衰竭的特点。液体复苏需在严密血流动力学监测下进行。 Objective To assess the hemodynamic characteristics and prognosis of patients with uroseptic shock. Methods Thirty patients with uroseptic shock and 30 patients with septic shock of other sources were included in the study. The hemodynamic parameters at 6h and 12h of early goal- directed therapy, the amount of fluid balance, the incidence of myocardial and kidney injury in the first 24h, the total dose of norepinephrine and 28- day mortality were compared between two groups. Results At 6h and 12h of early goal- directed therapy, patients of uroseptic shock had higher CVP, MAP,ScvO2,lower SVV;less amount of fluid in the first 24h,more dose of norepinephrine, more incidence of myocardial and acute kidney injury, higher 28- day mortality than other septic shock group. Conclusion Patients of uroseptic shock are more prone to heart failure and acute renal injury in early stage than other septic shock patients. It is necessary to closely monitor the hemodynamic parameters for fluid re-suscitation in patients with uroseptic shock.
作者 罗建 张伟文
出处 《浙江医学》 CAS 2014年第4期311-313,共3页 Zhejiang Medical Journal
基金 衢州市科技计划项目(20121062)
关键词 尿源性脓毒血症 血流动力学监测 早期目标导向治疗 Urosepsis Hemodynamics monitoring Eary goal directed therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Th O roff J W, Abrams P, Andersson K E, et al. EAU guidelines on urinary incontinence[J]. European Association of Urology, 2011, 59(3):387-400.
  • 2Brunkhorst F M. Epidemiology, economy and practice-results of the German study on prevalence by the competence network sepsis (SepNet) [J ]. Anasthesiol I ntensivmed Notfallmed Sch- merzther,2006,41(1 ):43-44.
  • 3Grabe M, Bjerklund-Johansen T E, Botto H, et al. Guidelines on urological infections[J].The Netherlands,European Association of Urology,2010, 4(1 ):224-241.
  • 4Sturgess D J, Marwick T H, Joyce C, et al. Prediction of hospital outcome in septic shock:a prospective comparison of tissue Doppler and cardiac biomarkers[J].Crit Care, 2010,14(2): R44.
  • 5Kellum J ,~Lameire N. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of a- cute kidney injury:a KDIGO summary[J].Crit Care,2013,17(1):204.
  • 6Brun-Buisson C. The epidemiology of the systemic inflammatory response[J].lntensive Care Med,2000,26(Supp1):564-574.
  • 7Hotchkiss R S, Karl I E. The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis[J].N Engl J Med,2003,348(2):138-150.
  • 8Mazzulli T. Resistance trends in urinary tract pathogens and im- pact on management[J]. J Urol,2002,168(4):1720-1722.
  • 9Hofmann W. Urosepsis and uroseptic shock[J]. Z Urol Nephrol, 1990,83(6):317-324.

同被引文献54

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部