期刊文献+

糖尿病患者胰岛素笔应用能力评估工具的编制与信效度检验 被引量:16

Development and psychometric testing of the tool for assessing application ability of insulin pen of diabetes patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 检验适用于糖尿病患者胰岛素笔应用能力的评估工具的信效度.方法 查阅文献并结合访谈患者,发展条目池;专家咨询和预试验等方法,形成包含3个因子20个条目的初始量表;调查苏州地区200例应用胰岛素笔治疗的糖尿病患者,评价量表的信效度.结果 探索性因素分析得到含有12个条目的3个公因子,累积解释变量为56.983%,内容效度为0.97,Cronbach α系数为0.765,奇偶折半系数为0.772,重测信度系数为0.910.结论 本工具有较好的信效度,适用于评价糖尿病患者对胰岛素笔的应用能力. Objective To develop the tool for assessing application ability of insulin pen of diabetes mellitus (DM) patients.Methods The item pool was formulated based on literature review and in-depth interviews and original tool.An initial tool was constructed through expert consultation and preliminary test.Totally 200 insulin-pen-using diabetics from Suzhou were investigated to test the reliability and validity of the tool.Results 3 factors containing 12 items were extracted by exploratory factor analysis.The 12 items could explain 56.983% of the total variance.The content validity index was 0.97,the Cronbach's α was 0.765,and test-retest reliability was 0.910.Conclusions The tool is proved to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing application ability of insulin pen of DM patients.
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 北大核心 2014年第7期24-27,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
关键词 胰岛素笔 注射 信度 效度 Insulin pen Injection Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Peyrot M,Rubin RR,Khunti K.Addressing barriers to initiation of in-sulin in patients with type 2 diabetes[J].Primary Care Diabetes,2010,4 (1):11-18.
  • 2Fry A.Insulin delivery device technology 2012:where are we after 90 years[J] ? J Diabetes Sci Teehnol,2012,6(4):947-953.
  • 3Lajara R,Guerrero G,Thurman J.Healthcare professional and patient perceptions of a new prefilled insulin pen versus vial and syringe[J].Expert Opin Drug Deliv,2012,9(10):1 181-1 196.
  • 4Peffetti R.Reusable and disposable insulin pens for the treatment of diabetes:understanding the global differences in user preference and an evaluation of inpatient insulin pen use[J].Diabetes Technol Ther,2010,12(1):79-85.
  • 5Oyer D,Niemeyer M,Moses A.Empowering people with diabetes:improving perceptions and outcomes with technical advances in in-sulin pens[J].Postgrad Med,2012,124(5):110-120.
  • 6罗樱樱,纪立农.胰岛素注射技术误区解析及国际规范推荐[J].中华糖尿病杂志,2011,3(3):267-270. 被引量:56
  • 7Claesson R,Ekelund M,Berntorp K.The potential impact of new diagnostic criteria on the frequency of gestational diabetes mellitus in Sweden[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2013,92(10):1 223-1226.
  • 8Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489-497.
  • 9Daving Y,Andren E,Nordholm L,et al.Reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure[J].Clin Rehahil,2001,15(3):301-310.
  • 10许义,庞建红,汪小华,王菲,李琳,王琪,蒋青.腹膜透析患者容量管理量表的编制及信效度检验[J].中国实用护理杂志,2013,29(25):67-69. 被引量:43

二级参考文献8

  • 1Locatelli F, Marcelli D, Conte F, et al. Survival and development of cardiovascular disease by modality of treatment in patients with end - stage renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2001,12:2411-2417.
  • 2Mehrotra R, Blake P, Berman N, et al. An analysis of dialysis training in the United State and Canada. Am J Kidney Dis, 2002,40:152-160.
  • 3Ates K, Nergizoglu G, Kenen K, et al. Effent of fluid and sodium removal on mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int,2001,60:767- 777.
  • 4Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you knowwhat's being reported critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health, 2006,29(5 ) : 489 -497.
  • 5吴明隆问卷统计分析实务.SPSS操作与应用.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010:258-265.
  • 6Daving Y, Andren E, Nordholm L, et al. Reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure. Clin Rehahil, 2001,15(3 ):301-310.
  • 7吕文律,丁小强,滕杰,邹建洲,吉俊.血液透析和腹膜透析患者死亡原因分析及比较[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2010,19(1):36-41. 被引量:38
  • 8史静琤,莫显昆,孙振球.量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2012,37(2):152-155. 被引量:1226

共引文献97

同被引文献146

引证文献16

二级引证文献145

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部