摘要
目的观察腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗输卵管妊娠的效果。方法选取143例输卵管妊娠患者分为两组,腹腔镜组82例,开腹手术组61例,比较两组的术中及术后情况。结果腹腔镜组的手术时间、腹痛消失时间、排气时间、下床活动时间和住院时间均短于开腹手术组,术中出血量少于开腹手术组,切口甲级愈合率高于开腹手术组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜手术治疗输卵管妊娠的效果优于开腹手术,是治疗输卵管妊娠的首选方法。
Objective To compare the effects of laparoscopie surgery and laparotomy in the treatment of tubal preg- nancy.Methods 143 cases of patients with tubal pregnancy were selected and divided into two groups.82 cases of la- paroscopic group,61 cases of laparotomy group.Situation of two groups before and after operation was compared.Results Operation time,pain disappearing time,exhaust time,ambulation time and hospitalization time of laparoscopic group was shorter than that of laparotomy group respectively,the amount of bleeding in laparoscopic group was less than that in la- parotomy group,class-A healing rate in laparoscopic group was higher than that in laparotomy group,with statistical dif- ference （P〈O.O5）.Conclusion The effect of laparoscopie surgery in the treatment of tubal pregnancy is superior to apa- totomy,which is the first choice in the treatment of tubal pregnancy.
出处
《中国当代医药》
2014年第8期184-185,共2页
China Modern Medicine
