期刊文献+

美国个人所得税对贫富差距的影响——基于1913—2011年经验数据分析 被引量:6

Impact of American Personal Income Tax on the Wealth Gap——Based on Empirical Data Analysis from 1913 to 2011
原文传递
导出
摘要 近100年以来,世界经历了两次大危机,而这两次大危机都是始发于美国。本文根据美国1913—2011年经验数据,比较分析美国个人所得税税率变化对贫富差距的影响。本文研究结论:(1)美国近100年的最高阶层收入比重和贫富差距整体上呈"U"型,而不是kuznets(1955)提出的倒"U"型;(2)个人所得税对贫富差距的调节起到重要的作用。 Over the past 100 years, the world has experienced two major crises, which two major crisis originated in the United States. Based on experience data analysis from 1913 to 2011, the paper analysis relationship between American personal income tax rate and wealth gap. The study concluded: (1) United States nearly 100 years the proportion of the highest levels of income and wealth gap is the whole "U", rather than inverted "U" shaped kuznets (1955) proposed; (2) The personal income tax play an important role on the wealth gap regulation. Results of the study have important reference for the future reform of tax system.
出处 《财经科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期119-127,共9页 Finance & Economics
关键词 美国 个人所得税 贫富差距 U. S. Personal Income Gap between Rich and Poor
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1彭骥鸣,王正明.经济发展、社会公平与税收政策[J].税收经济研究,1997,14(4):14-16. 被引量:1
  • 2Ktmaets, Economic Growth and Income Inequality [J]. American Economic Review, 1955.
  • 3Anthony B. Atldnson, Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, Top Incomes in the Long Run of History [ J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2011 (49): 1, 3-71.
  • 4Piketty Thomas & Emmanuel Saez, Income Inequality in the United States, 1913 - 1998. Quarterly Journal of Eco- nomics. 2003 (2).
  • 5黄树东.中国你要警惕[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011:251-252.
  • 6Joel Slemrod & Jon Bakija. Taxing ourselves: a citizen's guide to the great debate over tax reform. M1T, 2000:23 -24.
  • 7Wojciech Kopczuk & Emmanuel Saez, Top Wealth Shares in the United States, 1916 - 2000: Evidence from Estate Tax Returns [Jl. national tax journal, 2004 (3).
  • 8Emmanuel Saez, Top incomes in the united states and canada over the twentieth century [J]. Journal of the Euro- pean Economic Association, 2005 (4).
  • 9纪玉山.库兹涅茨倒U理论质疑[J].社会科学战线,1997(3):67-74. 被引量:16
  • 10陈弘.对“倒U型假说”的一个批判性分析[J].当代经济研究,2012(11):38-44. 被引量:4

二级参考文献28

引证文献6

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部