期刊文献+

下颌下腺窝骨倒凹锥形束CT测量分析 被引量:3

Measurement and analysis of submandibular fossa by Cone-beam CT
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:分析下颌下腺窝骨倒凹解剖形态,为下颌磨牙区牙种植术提供参考依据。方法:利用锥形束CT(cone-beam computed tomography,CBCT)扫描成像,分析下颌下腺窝解剖形态特点;在磨牙区模拟植入不同直径种植体,测量下颌下腺窝、下颌管及种植体相关数据,分析三者的空间位置关系。结果:第一磨牙区下颌下腺窝骨倒凹深度为(1.0±0.61)mm,第二磨牙区为(1.5±0.61)mm,性别、左右及缺牙导致的差异均无统计学意义。牙存在者第一磨牙区发生舌侧穿孔时种植体长度为(19.7±3.75)mm(d=4 mm)和(18.6±3.73)mm(d=5mm),第二磨牙区为(16.2±3.46)mm(d=4 mm)和(15.2±3.09)mm(d=5 mm),牙缺失者第一磨牙区发生舌侧穿孔时种植体长度为(17.1±3.77)mm(d=4 mm)和(15.6±3.85)mm(d=5 mm),第二磨牙区为(14.2±4.05)mm(d=4 mm)和(13.2±4.27)mm(d=5 mm),是否缺牙的差异具有统计学意义。结论:在下颌磨牙区进行牙种植手术时,通过CBCT分析下颌下腺窝、下颌管及种植体的空间位置关系,对手术具有重要指导意义。 Objective To evaluate the anatomic morphology of submandibular fossa. Methods Cone- beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to analyze the anatomic morphology of submandibular fossa. Implants of various dimensions were virtually placed into the mandibular 1st and 2nd molar region. Spatial relationships among submandibular fossa, mandibular canal and implant were analyzed. Results The depth of the submandibular fossa was (1.0 ± 0.61)ram in the 1st molar region and (1.5 ±0.61)ram in the 2nd molar region. There were no significant statistical difference in genders, sides, and tooth loss. The length of the implants was (19.7 ± 3.75)mm (d = 4 mm) and (18.6 ±3.73)mm (d = 5 mm) in the 1st molar region and (16.2 ± 3.46) mm (d = 4 mm) and (15.2± 3.09)mm (d = 5 ram) in the 2nd molar region in patiens with teeth and lingual perforation; the length of the implants was (17.1 ±3.77)mm (d = 4 mm) and (15.6 ±3.85)mm (d = 5 ram), and (14.2 ± 4.05)mm (d = 4 mm) and (13.2± 4.27)mm (d = 5 mm) in patients with tooth loss, respectively. Conclusions Determination of spatial relationships among submandibular fossa, mandibular canal and implants by using CBCT has important significance in guiding dental implant surgery.
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第6期944-946,共3页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
基金 2013年度河南省医学科技攻关计划项目(编号:201303099)
关键词 下颌骨 下颌下腺窝 牙种植体 锥形束CT Mandible Submandibular fossa Dental implants Cone-beam computed tomography
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Chan HL, Benavides E, Ych CY, et al. Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography [J]. J Periodontol, 2011,82( 1 ) : 129-135.
  • 2Parnia F, Fard EM, Mboub F, et al. Tomographie wolume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2010,109( 1 ) :e32-e36.
  • 3de Oliveira JOnior MR, Saud AL, Fonseea DR, et al. Morphometrical analysis of the human mandibular canal: a CT investigation[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2011,33(4) :345-352.
  • 4刘金萍,刘晓斌,贺龙龙,常晓峰.锥形束CT对下颌后牙区下颌管位置的三维测量研究[J].中国美容医学,2012,21(10):1828-1830. 被引量:2
  • 5White SC. Cone-beam imaging in dentistry [J]. Health ptlysics, 2008,95 (5) : 628-637.
  • 6Ganz SD. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing applications using CT and cone beam CT scanning teehnolo[J]. Dent Clin North Am, 2008,52(4):777-808.
  • 7Kim SE, Kim JS, Kim JD. Comparison of the buceolingual inclination in alveolar bone and tooth using dental CBCT [J]. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol, 2008,38( 1 ) : 17-22.
  • 8Gtiler AU, Sumer M, Sumer P, et al. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the loeation of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentuhms patients for implant dentistry [J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2005,32 (10) :741-746.
  • 9Yu DC, Friedland BD, Karimbux NY, et al. Supramandibular Canal Portion Superior to the Fossa of the Submaxillary (;land: A Tomographic Evaluation of the Cross-Sectional Dimension in the Molar Region [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2013,15(5): 750-758.

二级参考文献8

  • 1de Oliveira Junior,M. R.,Saud, A.L.,Fonseca, D. R.,et al. Morphometrical analysis of the human mandibular canal:a CT investigation [J].Surg Radiol Anat,2010,DOI 10.1007/s00276-010-0708-3.
  • 2Yu IH,Wong YK.Evaluation of mandibular anatomy related to sagittal split ramus osteotomy using 3-dimensional computed tomography scan images [J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2008,37: 521-528.
  • 3Kriwalsky MS,Maurer P,Veras RB,et al.Risk factors for a bad split during sagittal split osteotomy[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2008,46: 177-179.
  • 4Trauner R,Obwegeser HL.The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty.Part I. Surgical procedures to correct mandibular prognathism and reshaping of the chin[J].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol,1957,10:677-689.
  • 5Naitoh M,Nakahara K, Suenaga Y,et al.Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures [J].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2010,109:e25 -e31.
  • 6吴银洲,吴利民,胡圣望.100例下颌骨下颌管形态及其奄牙槽嵴距离的观测研究[J].口腔颁面修复学杂志,2004,5(3):180-181.
  • 7王蓓,房洪波,徐兵,史俊.100例正常人下颌管的三维测量[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2010,26(2):223-226. 被引量:5
  • 8钱文涛,樊林峰,徐光宙,张瑛.CBCT观察影像重叠的下颌第三磨牙与下颌管的位置关系[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2010,20(6):398-403. 被引量:20

共引文献1

同被引文献10

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部