期刊文献+

基于导游过度自信的激励机制设计与分析 被引量:2

Design and Analysis of Incentive Mechanism based on Tour Guide's Overconfidence
原文传递
导出
摘要 传统的激励模型均假设委托方和代理方为完全理性的,但在旅游业中,如何对非理性(具体表现为过度自信)的导游实施有效激励是旅行社面临的更为实际的问题.利用博弈论和机制设计理论等,设计了不同信息条件下导游具有过度自信心理特征的激励机制,分析了过度自信水平对激励参数、服务努力水平、旅行社的期望效用和代理成本的影响.结果表明,与传统的激励模型相比,考虑导游过度自信的激励机制能进一步激励其提高服务努力水平,从而使旅行社的期望效用得到改善,并降低了代理成本. In traditional incentive models, both the principal and the agent are assumed rational, however, how the travel agency conducts effective incentive on the irrational tour guides (i.e., over confidence) is a more practical issue in the tourism industry. This paper, by using game theory and mechanism design theory, designs incentive mechanism with tour guide's over confidence under different asymmetric information, and then analyzed the impacts of level of over confidence on incentive parameters, level of service effort, expected utility of the travel agency and the agent costs. The results show that, comparing with the traditional incentive models, incentive mechanism with tour guides' over confidence not only can further enhance the level of service effort,but also can make the travel agency better off and therefore reduce the agent costs.
出处 《数学的实践与认识》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期101-106,共6页 Mathematics in Practice and Theory
基金 国家自然科学基金(71201053) 湖南省哲学社会科学基金(11YBA098)
关键词 旅游业 过度自信 机制设计 非对称信息 tourism industry over confidence mechanism design asymmetric information
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Zhang X, Song H Y, Huang G Q. Tourism supply chain management: a new research agenda[J]. Tourism Management, 2009, 30(3): 345-358.
  • 2Holmstrom B. Moral hazard and observe ability[J]. The Bell Journal of Economics, 1979, 10 (1): 74-91.
  • 3Holmstrom, B, Milgrom P. Aggregation and Linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives[J]. Econometrica, 1987, 55(2): 303-328.
  • 4Holmstrom B, Paul M, Multi-task principal agent analyses: incentive contract s, asset ownership and job design[J]. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 1991, 7(9): 24-52.
  • 5严志辉,钟美瑞,黄健柏.基于过度自信的多任务委托——代理模型扩展研究[J].系统工程,2006,24(2):19-22. 被引量:15
  • 6黄健柏,杨涛,伍如昕.非对称过度自信条件下委托代理模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2009,29(4):92-102. 被引量:40
  • 7Gibbons R. Incentives between Firms (and within)[J]. Management Science, 2005, 51(1): 2-17.
  • 8Keiber K L. Managerial compensation contracts and overconfidence[R]. WHU Otto Beisheim Grad- uate School of Management, 2002.
  • 9黄健柏,伍如昕,杨涛.基于代理人过度自信的报酬契约设计研究[J].软科学,2009,23(5):97-102. 被引量:4
  • 10让雅克·拉丰,大卫·马赫蒂摩.激励理论(第一卷):委托一代理模型[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.

二级参考文献51

共引文献53

同被引文献25

  • 1黄俊武,李飞.导游薪酬问题的产生根源及其治理措施[J].特区经济,2007(6):186-188. 被引量:21
  • 2Uchiyama H.The Index of Agency Cost and the Financial Accelerator:The Case of Japan[J].Japan and the World Economy,2006,18(1):22-48.
  • 3Zhou M,Wang X.Agency Cost and the Crisis of China's SOE[J].China Economic Review,2000,11(3):297-317.
  • 4Belghitar Y,Clark E.Managerial Risk Incentives and Investment Related Agency Costs[J].International Review of Financial Analysis,2015,38:191-197.
  • 5Truong T T,Heaney R.The Determinants of Equity Agency Conflicts between Managers and Shareholders:Evidence from Australia[J].Journal of Multinational Financial Management,2013,23(4):314-326.
  • 6Jurkus A F,Park J C,Woodard L S.Women in Top Management and Agency Costs[J].Journal of Business Research,2011,64(2):180-186.
  • 7Leventis S,Weetman P,Caramanis C.Agency Costs and Product Market Competition:The Case of Audit Pricing in Greece[J].The British Accounting Review,2011,43(2):112-119.
  • 8Claus I.The Effects of Asymmetric Information between Borrowers and Lenders in an Open Economy[J].Journal of International Money and Finance,2011,30(5):796-816.
  • 9Lin H,Lin F,Hsiao T,et al.Fuzzy Set Theory in Managerial Contract Analyses[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2009,36(3):4535-4540.
  • 10Laffont J J,Tirole J A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation[M].Cambridge:MIT Press,1993.

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部