期刊文献+

CREB磷酸化水平在慢性应激模型大鼠中表达研究 被引量:8

The study on the expression of the p-CREB in a rat model of chronic mild stress
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨慢性应激状态下,以及持续给予盐酸氟西汀后,大鼠海马及前额叶部位环磷酸腺苷反应元件结合蛋白(cAMP-response element binding protein,CREB)水平和磷酸化CREB(p-CREB)表达的变化。方法成年雄性Sprague-Dawley(SD)大鼠50只随机分为三组:应激组26只,药物组12只,对照组12只。应激组与药物组大鼠均经过8周慢性应激刺激,药物组在第1周开始给予盐酸氟西汀(10mg/g,I.P.),直到8周末。8周后行糖水偏好实验和旷场实验,根据8周末糖水偏爱率将应激组大鼠分为应激敏感组和应激适应组。应激结束后将四组大鼠断头处死,采用蛋白免疫印记技术检测大鼠海马、额叶部位CREB和p-CREB水平。结果 8周末应激敏感组糖水偏爱率低于应激适应组、药物组及对照组(均P<0.05);应激敏感组的跨格次数、中心格时间和直立次数低于药物组和对照组(均P<0.05),与应激适应组无统计学差异(均P>0.05)。应激敏感组海马及前额叶中p-CREB水平明显低于应激适应组、药物组及对照组(均P<0.05);四组大鼠海马部位、前额叶CREB表达水平无明显差异。结论海马和额叶部位CREB磷酸化水平可能与应激导致的情绪障碍发生机制相关。 Objective To better understand the role of CREB signaling pathway in chronic mild stress (CMS), we investigated the alteration of CREB and p-CREB in CMS rats with and without fluoxetine hydroehloride. Methods Fifty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups: CMS group (26), fluoxtine group (12) and con-trol group (12). The rats in CMS group and fluoxtine group received 8 weeks of chronic mild stress. Rats in fluoxtine group were administered daily injections of fluoxetine lOmg/kg I.P. Sucrose preference tests and open-field test were car- ried out after the 8th week. Based on endpoint sucrose-intake, animals were further divided into 4 groups: CMS sensitive group, CMS resilient group, fluoxtine group and control group. Western blot was used to detect the expression levels of CREB and p-CREB in the hippoeampus and prefrontal cortex. Results The sucrose consumption was significantly de- creased in CMS resilience group compared to sensitive group, control group and fluoxetine-intervention group (all P〈0.05). Similarly, the numbers in total arm entries, percentage of entries into open arms and time spent in open arms was significantly lower in CMS resilience group compared to control group(all P〈0.05), but not different compared to CMS sensitive group(all P〈0.05). The p-CREB in the hippocampus was significantly lower in CMS sensitive rat compared to CMS resilience group, control group and fluoxetine-intervention group(all P〈0.05), but CREB was not dfferent among the four groups(all P〈0.05). Conclusions The elevated phosphorylation of CREB in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex of resilience CMS rats may contribute to the mood alteration induced by stress.
出处 《中国神经精神疾病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期26-30,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases
基金 上海交通大学科学基金(编号:11XJ21006) 上海市自然科学基金(编号:09ZR1427200) 上海市卫生局公共卫生海外人才项目(编号:GWHW201208) 国家高技术研究发展计划"863"计划(编号:2006AA02Z430) 国家自然科学基金重大计划项目(编号:91232719) 国家临床重点专科-上海市精神卫生中心(编号:卫生部医政司2011-873)
关键词 环磷酸腺苷反应元件结合蛋白 慢性应激 抑郁症 盐酸氟西汀 CREB Chronic mild stress Depression Fluoxtine
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Davidson JR, Stein DJ, Shalev AY, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder: acquisition, recognition, course, and treatment[J]. Neu- ropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, 2004, 16(2):135-147.
  • 2刘晓华,徐一峰,崔东红,江三多,钱伊萍,禹顺英,江开达.抑郁症患者外周血白细胞中CREB1基因表达研究[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2010,36(4):237-240. 被引量:2
  • 3Bergstr~m A, Jayatissa MN, M0rk A, et al. Stress sensitivity and resilience in the chronic mild stress rat model of depression: an in situ hybridization study[J]. Brain Res, 2008, 1196(27): 41-52.
  • 4Katz R J, Roth KA, Carroll BJ. Acute and chronic stress effects on open-field activity in the rat: implications for a model of de- pression[J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 1981, 5(2): 247-251.
  • 5Masten AS, Coatsworth JD. The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments. Lessons from research on successful children[J]. Am Psychol, 1998, 53(2): 205-220.
  • 6D.' Aquila PS, Peana AT, Carboni V, et al. Exploratory behaviour and grooming after repeated restraint and chronic mild stress: ef- fect of desipramine[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2000, 399(1):43-47.
  • 7Hu H, Su L, Xu YQ, et al. Behavioral and [F-18] fluorodeoxy- glucose micro positron emission tomography imaging study in arat chronic mild stress model of depression[J]. Neuroscience, 2010, 169(1): 171-181.
  • 8Krishnan V, Han MH, Graham DL, et al. Molecular adaptations underlying susceptibility and resistance to social defeat in brain reward regions[J]. Cell, 2007, 131(2): 391-404.
  • 9Gr~nli J, Bramham C, Murison R, et al. Chronic mild stress in- hibits BDNF protein expression and CREB activation in the den- tate gyrus but not in the hippocampus proper[J]. Pharmacol Bio- chem Behav, 2006, 85(4): 842-849.
  • 10Laifenfeld D, Karry R, Grauer E, et al. Antidepressants and pro- longed stress in rats modulate CAM-L1, laminin, and pCREB, implicated in neuronal plasticity[J]. Neurobiol Dis, 2005, 20(2): 432-441.

二级参考文献26

  • 1陈宏,李秀英,李荣琴,苏中华.氟西汀、文拉法辛和吗氯贝胺治疗不典型抑郁症的疗效比较[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2007,33(2):105-107. 被引量:7
  • 2Warner-Schmidt JL, Duman RS. Hippocampal neurogenesis: opposing effects of stress and antidepressant treatment [ J ]. Hippocampus, 2006, 16(3) :239 -249.
  • 3Nakagawa S, Kim JE, Lee R, et al. Localization of phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein in immature neurons of adult hippocampus[ J]. J Neurosci, 2002, 22 (22) :9868 - 9876.
  • 4Tsai SJ. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor: a bridge between major depression and Alzheimer's disease? [ J]. Med Hypotheses, 2003, 61(1) :110 -113.
  • 5Xu H, Steven R J, Li XM. Dose-related effects of chronic antidepressants on neuroprotective proteins BDNF, Bcl-2 and Cu/Zn- SOD in rat hippocampus [ J ]. Neuropsychophannacology, 2003, 28( 1 ) :53 -62.
  • 6Willner P. Validity, reliability and utility of the chronic mild stress model of depression : a 1 O-year review and evaluation [ J ]. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 1997, 134(4):319-329.
  • 7Sairanen M, O'Leary OF, Knuuttila JE, et al. Chronic antidepressant treatment selectively increases expression of plasticity-related proteins in the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex of the rat [J]. Neuroscience, 2007, 144(1 ) :368 -374.
  • 8Xu H, Chen Z, He J, et al. Synergetic effects of quetiapine and venlafaxine in preventing the chronic restraint stress-induced decrease in cell proliferation and BDNF expression in rat hippocampus[J]. Hippocampus, 2006, 16(6) :551 -559.
  • 9Cremer H, Chazal G, Lledo PM, et al. PSA-NCAM: an important regulator of hippocampal plasticity [ J ]. Int J Dev Neurosci, 2000, 18(2 -3) :213 -220.
  • 10Nakagawa S, Kim JE, Lee R, et al. Regulation of neurogenesis in adult mouse hippocampus by cAMP and the cAMP response element-binding protein [ J ]. J Neurosci, 2002, 22 ( 9 ) : 3673 - 3682.

共引文献6

同被引文献115

  • 1冯飞,许崇涛,徐国建.快速眼动睡眠剥夺对抑郁模型大鼠海马5-HT NE及腺苷的影响[J].临床心身疾病杂志,2013,19(4):289-292. 被引量:1
  • 2唐量,田振军,熊正英,张英起.应用基因芯片技术对疲劳性运动小鼠脑组织脂肪酸代谢相关基因表达的初步研究[J].中国应用生理学杂志,2005,21(2):137-139. 被引量:10
  • 3黄蕾,曲常胜,陈凯,等.重金属污染的健康风险评估与调控研究[C].//2011年重金属污染防治技术及风险评价研讨会论文集.2011:264-267.
  • 4Tsai SY, Chou HY, Men H, et al. The effects of chronic arsenic ex- posure from drinking water on the neurobehavioral development in ado- lescence[J ]. Neurotoxicology, 2003, 24(4 - 5) : 747 - 753.
  • 5Tachibana N, Shirakawa T, Ishii K, et al. Expression of various gluta- mate receptors including N - methyl - D - aspartate receptor (NMDAR) in an ovarian teratoma removed from a young woman with anti- NMDAR encephalitis [ J ]. Intern Med, 2011,49 ( 19 ) : 2167 - 2173.
  • 6Barlett TE, Bannister NJ, Collett VJ, et al. Differential roles of NR2A and NR2B - containing NMDA receptors in LTP and LTD in the CA1 region of two-week old rat hippocarnpus[J ]. Neuropharrna- cology, 2007, 52(1):60-70.
  • 7Fazio L, Blasi G, Taurisano P, et al. D2 receptor genotype and striatal dopamine signaling predict motor cortical activity and behavior in hu- mans[J]. Neuroimage, 2011,54 (4) :2915 - 2921.
  • 8Martel MA, Wyllie DJ, Hardingham GE. In developing hippoeampal neurons, NR2B - containg N - methyl - D - aspartate receptors (NMDARs) can mediate signaling to neuronal survival and synaptic po- tentiation, as well as neuronal death[J]. Neuroscience, 2009, 158 ( 1 ) : 334 - 343.
  • 9Calabresi P, Ammassari - teule M, Gubellini P, et al. A synaptie mechanism underlying the behavioral abnormalities induced by manga- nese intoxication[J].Neurobiol Dis, 2001,8(3)1419-432.
  • 10Lee FJ, Xue S, Pei L, et al. Dual regulation of NMDA receptor functions by direct protein - protein interactions with the doparnine D1 recelxor[ J ]. Cell, 2002,111 ; 219 - 230.

引证文献8

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部