期刊文献+

≤4cm肾少脂肪血管平滑肌脂肪瘤与透明细胞癌的CT鉴别诊断 被引量:13

The CT Differential Diagnosis of Small Kidney Angioleiomyolipoma Containning Minimal Fat and Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的回顾性分析直径≤4 cm的肾少脂肪血管平滑肌脂肪瘤(AML)与透明细胞癌(CCRCC)的CT表现,以期提高二者的影像诊断水平。方法回顾性分析经手术病理证实的15例少脂肪AML及45例CCRCC的CT扫描图像,包括多种CT征象、病灶各期密度值及增强程度值,对相应资料进行统计学分析。结果少脂肪AML与CCRCC在性别、平扫密度、强化均匀性及病灶中心定位上差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组病例在年龄、瘤内坏死或囊变、肿瘤直径、形状、钙化、边界、皮质掀起征、强化类型及病灶与正常肾实质交角上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。少脂肪AML病灶平扫密度高于CCRCC(P<0.05);皮质延髓期及早期排泄期肿瘤密度值无明显差异(P>0.05),但CCRCC肿瘤增强程度值均高于少脂肪AML(P<0.05)。结论平扫密度、增强均匀性、病灶中心定位及肿瘤增强程度值对二者鉴别诊断起重要作用。 Objective To analyze the CT performances of kidney angioleiomyolipoma containing minimal fat and clear cell renal cell carcinoma( in diameter of≤4 cm ). Methods The CT images of 15 patients with AML eontainning minimal fat and 45 patients with CCRCC confirmed by pathology were retrospectively analyzed. The CT features of AML containning minimal fat and CCRCC on plain and muhiple phase enhancement were compared. Results The features, included sex, unenhaneement, non homogenous enhancement and location of lesion center had significant differences between AML containning minimal fat and CCRCC ( P 〈 0.05 ). The age of patient, tumor necrosis or cystic degeneration, the tumor diameter, shape, calcification, boundary, cortex set off sign, enhancement type, and angle of intersection had no significance difference between AML eontainning minimal fat and CCRCC ( P 〉 0.05 ). The CT attenuation of AML containing minimal fat was higher than that of CCRCC on plain CT images ( P 〈 0.05 ). The tumor density value of cortieobulbar period and early discharge period bad no significance differences between AML containing minimal fat and CCRCC ( P 〉 0.05 ) , but the enhanced degree of CCRCC were higher than that of AML containning minimal fat ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Unenhanement, non homogenous enhanement, location of the lesion center and tumor enhancement degree play an important role in differential diagnosis of AML containning minimal fat and CCRCC.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期406-409,共4页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
基金 辽宁省教育厅科研项目计划(编号:L2010665)
关键词 肾肿瘤 体层摄影术 X线计算机 对比分析 Kidney neoplasm Tomography, X-ray computed Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Sant GR, t leaney JA, Uccd AA Jr,et al. Computed tomographic find- ings in rcmal arlgiomyoliloma: an histologic comelation. Urology, 1984,24 : 293.
  • 2Kim JK, Park SY, Short JH, et al. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat : differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT. Radi- ology, 2004,230 : 667.
  • 3Jinzaki M, Tanimoto A, Narimatsu Y, et al. Angiomyolipoma :imaging findings in lesions with minimal fat. Radiolov. 1997.205:497.
  • 4金征宁.医学影像学.第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010,436.
  • 5Hafron J, l%garty JD, Hoenig DM, et al. hnaging characteristics of minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma with histologic correlations. Urolo- gy ,2005,66 : 1155.
  • 6Obuz F, Karabay N, Secil M, el al. Various radiological appearances of angiomyolipomas in the same kidney. Eur Radiol,2000,10:897.
  • 7Ohkawa M, Kadoya M, Nonomura A. Renal angiomyolipoma com- posed primarily of smooth muscle elemenl: diagnostic consideration. Urol lnt, 1995,54:230.
  • 8Hosokawa Y, Kinouchi T,Sawai Y,et al. Renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat. lnt J Clin Oncol,2002,7:120.
  • 9李绍科,杨学东,于华龙,孙磊,王燕,张传玉.误诊为肾细胞癌的少脂肪型肾脏血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的CT表现[J].中国医学影像技术,2011,27(9):1871-1875. 被引量:11
  • 10朱捷,刘荣波,周翔平,武志峰,卢春燕,王娜.肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤与肾癌的CT鉴别诊断[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2005,36(2):257-260. 被引量:17

二级参考文献21

  • 1唐光健,许燕.肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤与肾癌的CT鉴别诊断[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(10):1090-1093. 被引量:114
  • 2Jinzaki M, Tanimoto A, Narimatsu Y, et al. Angiomyolipoma: imaging findings in lesions with minimal fat. Radiology, 1997, 205(2) :497-502.
  • 3Kim JK, Park SY, Shon JH, et al. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT. Radiology, 2004,230(3):677-684.
  • 4Hafron J, Fogarty JD, Hoenig DM, et al. Imaging characteristics of minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma with histologle correlations. Urology, 2005,66(6) :1155-1159.
  • 5Verma SK, Mitchell DG, Yang R, et al. Exophytic renal masses: angular interface with renal parenchyma for distinguishing benign from malignant lesions at MR imaging. Radiology, 2010, 255(2):501-507.
  • 6Bosniak MA, Megibow AJ, Hulnick DH, et al. CT diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma : the importance of detecting small amounts of fat. AmJ Roentgenol, 1988,51 (3) :497-501.
  • 7Kim JY, Kim JK, Kim N. et al. CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging. Radiology, 2008,246(2):472-479.
  • 8Simpfendorfer C, Herts BR, Motta-Ramirez GA, et al. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat on MDCT: can counts of negative-attenuation pixels aid diagnosis? Am J Roentgenol, 2009, 192(2) : 438-443.
  • 9Kutikov A, Fossett LK, Ramchandani P, et al. Incidence of benign pathological findings at partial nephrectomy for solitary renal mass presumed to be renal cell carcinoma on preoperative imaging. Urology, 2006,68(4):737-740.
  • 10Masahiro J, Akihiro T, Yoshiaki N, et al. Angiomyolipoma:imaging findings in lesions with minimal fat. Radiology, 1997;205(2):497.

共引文献52

同被引文献88

引证文献13

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部