期刊文献+

飞行器机动动作风险定量评估模型 被引量:9

Risk quantitative evaluation model of the aircraft maneuver
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了定量评估机动动作的风险,构建机动动作风险定量评估模型。提出使用关键点划分机动动作,并给出了不同风险等级的划分及其含义;由于关键点的风险等级与参数离差划分区间之间的不确定性,使用贝叶斯定理确定关键点处于不同风险等级的概率,并结合不同风险等级的权重得到关键点的风险值;由于专家在判断过程中的模糊性及不确定性,使用模糊层次分析法确定不同关键点的权重,最终实现了机动动作风险的定量评估。仿真实验部分以典型的机动动作斤斗为例进行研究,通过对斤斗动作实际数据的分析,验证了机动动作风险定量评估模型的有效性。 To evaluate the risk of the aircraft maneuver, a risk quantitative evaluation model is proposed. Key points are used to divide the maneuver and the definitions of different risk levels are given. As the uncer- tainty of the relationship between risk levels and parameters deviation, Bayesian inference is used to determine the probabilities of different risk levels. Combined with the weights of different risk levels, the risk values of different key points can be obtained. Because of the fuzzy judgment of different experts, fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) is used to determine the weights of the key points. Finally, the risk quantitative assessment of the maneuver is realized. The risk quantitative evaluation model is used to analyze the characteristic maneuver, i.e. loop. Through the analysis of the real data of the looo maneuver,the effectiveness of the model is validated.
出处 《系统工程与电子技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期469-475,共7页 Systems Engineering and Electronics
基金 国家自然科学基金(61074152)资助课题
关键词 机动动作 风险等级 风险评估 贝叶斯定理 模糊层次分析法 Bayesian networks Inference engines
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献37

  • 1徐祥松.飞行数据与安全[J].民航经济与技术,1995(1):27-30. 被引量:1
  • 2Roelne A L C.The development of aviation safety performance indicators:An exploratory study[M].Amsterdam,Netherlands:National Aerospace Laboratory,1998:12-16.
  • 3Warren D.Guidelines and methods for conducting the safety assessment process on civil airborne systems and equipments[S].SAE ARP4761,U S:Aerospace Recommended Practice,1996:46~55.
  • 4Robert D.CFIT checklist:Evaluate the risk and take action[M].Alexandria,VA,U S:The Flight Safety Foundation.1994:43-49.
  • 5Biggs D,Hamilton C.Risk indicators and their link with air carrier safety[J].Flight Safety Foundation Digest,2001(10):1-6.
  • 6Jones S.An overview of the NASA aviation safety program assessment process[C]//Proceeding of AIAA's 3rd Annual Aviation Technology,Integration,and Operations.Denver,Colorado,U.S:AIAA.2003:17-22.
  • 7BOWEN B D,HEADLEY D E.The Airline Quality Rating[EB/OL][2010-11-05].http://downloacs.aqr.aero/reports/2008aqr.pdf,Apr 1997.
  • 8LUXHOEJ J T,COIT D W.Modeling Low Probability/High Consequence Events:an Aviation Safety Risk Model[C]//Reliability and Maintainability Symposium,Newport Beach,California,2006 Annual 2006:215-221.
  • 9HADJIMICHAEL M,MCCARTHY J.Implementing the Flight Operations Risk Assessment System[C]//57th International Air Safety Seminar,Shanghai,China,Nov 2004.
  • 10The Free Encyclopedia[EB/OL].[2010-04-15].http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_neural_network.

共引文献41

同被引文献66

引证文献9

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部