期刊文献+

腹腔镜及开放手术对结直肠癌术后复发与转移的影响分析 被引量:3

暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的对腹腔镜及开放手术对结直肠癌术后复发与转移的影响分析。方法选取2012年1月至2013年6月我院收治的结直肠癌患者86例,随机分为两组患者,治疗组患者44例,依据患者情况均进行腹腔镜手术;观察组患者42例,均采用常规开腹手术方法治疗,对两组患者的临床治疗效果进行分析。结果治疗组患者手术操作时间、住院治疗时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、术后并发症发生率,均优越于观察组患者,具有显著性差异,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组在局部复发、种植转移、远处转移、复发率、3年、5年生存率,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。其中治疗组患者腹腔镜手术失败3例,转为开放手术治疗。两组患者均未发生因治疗导致严重不良后果。结论针对结直肠癌患者,采用腹腔镜手术治疗对比开放性手术治疗,结果显示术后复发与转移率差异性不大,同时还能够显著降低平均术中平均出血量、手术治疗时间、缩短住院治疗时间、术后排气时间,减少术后合并症发生率,安全性较高,可依据患者的情况进行应用和治疗。
作者 杨崧 林启谋
出处 《中国医药指南》 2014年第6期162-163,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Veldkamp R,Kuhry E.Hop WC Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial[J].Lancet Oncol,2005,6(7):477-484.
  • 2Jayne DG,Guillou PJ,Thorpe H.Randomized trail of laparoscopic- assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma:3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trail Group[J].J Clin Oncol,2007,25(21):30 61-3068.
  • 3Tang CL,Eu KW, Tai BC.Randomized clinical trail of the effect of open versus laparoscopically assistant colectomy on systemic immunity in patients with colorectal cancer[J].Br J Surg,2001,88(6):801-807.
  • 4甘露,张超,曾冬竹,蔡志民,靳明林,陈华.结直肠癌患者腹腔镜手术与开腹手术后并发症的风险因素分析[J].第三军医大学学报,2008,30(17):1668-1670. 被引量:27
  • 5姜涛,刘彤,王鹏志.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌临床效果比较的Meta分析[J].中国全科医学,2011,14(5):510-515. 被引量:69
  • 6Braga M,Frasson M,Vignali A,et al.Laparoscopic resection inrectal Cancer patients:outcome and cost-benefit analysis[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2007,50(4):464-471.
  • 7Lacy AM,Garcia-Valdecasas JC,Delgado S,et al.Laparoseopyo assisted Colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of dOn- metastatic colon cancer:a randomised trial[J].Lancet,2002,359(9 325):2224-2229.
  • 8陆培华,陶国清,沈伟,纪律,孙键,蒋志阳,项成.国内腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术根治效果的Meta分析[J].中华消化外科杂志,2008,7(6):458-460. 被引量:27

二级参考文献36

  • 1王炜,刘斌,杨志明.经内镜注墨定位在腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术中的应用[J].中国全科医学,2009,12(5):375-376. 被引量:14
  • 2Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy) [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991, 1 (3) : 144 - 150.
  • 3Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer : short - term outcomes of a randomised trial [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2005, 6 (7): 477-484.
  • 4Lacy AM, Garcia - Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy - assisted eolectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non - metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial [J]. Lancet, 2002, 359 (9325) : 2224 - 2229.
  • 5Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials : is blinding necessary [ J ]. Control Clin Trials, 1996, 17 (1): 1-12.
  • 6Stage JG, Schulze S, Moiler P, et al. Prospective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adenocarcinoma [J]. Br J Surg, 1997, 84 (3): 391-396.
  • 7Sehwenk W, Bohm B, Haase O, et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional colorectal resection: a prospective randomised study of postoperative ileus and early postoperative feeding [J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 1998, 383 (1): 49-55.
  • 8Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopie versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report [J]. J Am Coll Surg, 1998, 187 (1): 46-55.
  • 9Tang CL, Eu KW, Tai BC, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of open versus laparoscopically assisted colectomy on systemic immunity in patients with colorectal cancer [J]. Br J Surg, 2001, 88 (6): 801 -807.
  • 10Lacy AM, Garcia - Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy - assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non - metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial [J]. Lancet, 2002, 359(9325): 2224 -2229.

共引文献119

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部