摘要
国际体育仲裁院和世界上大多数仲裁机构都将兴奋剂案件与其他不服体育组织裁决的上诉纠纷视为同一性质的纠纷,按照上诉仲裁程序处理,美国和日本却将兴奋剂案件作为一类特别的案件,并为其设立了一套独立的兴奋剂案件仲裁程序。美国兴奋剂案件仲裁程序相比其他体育仲裁程序,增加了仲裁的透明度,加强了对弱势一方当事人的程序保障,提高了仲裁的效率;日本则在兴奋剂仲裁程序中,设置了若干加速程序,限制了当事人的合意,扩大了仲裁的公开范围。但比较而言,美国的兴奋剂案件仲裁程序的透明度和对弱势一方的保障程度都要高于日本。
The court of arbitration for sport and many other arbitration angencies make doping case as the ordinaray sport case which appeals against the decision of the sport organization, and resolve it with the appeal arbitration procedure. But the America and Japan make the do- ping case as a special case and make a independent arbitration procedure rule for the doping case. The American arbitration procedure for doping case have increased the transparency of the procedure, enhanced the procedural protections for the vulnerable party and improved the procedure efficiency. The Japanese arbitration procedure for doping case have set some acceler ated rules, restricted the consensus of the parties and expanded the public range of the arbitra tion. Compareing the American arbitration procedure for doping case with the Japan, the Amer ican one have greater transparency and make more procedural protections for the vulnerable party.
出处
《中国体育科技》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第2期133-139,共7页
China Sport Science and Technology
基金
国际体育仲裁程序机制专题研究项目(11CFX076)
关键词
体育仲裁
兴奋剂
美国
日本
sport arbitration
doping
America Japan
