摘要
目的 探讨不同气道湿化方式对气管切开患者的护理效果.方法 以我院2011-01~2013-01间收治的行气管切开的80例患者为研究对象,随机分为观察组与对照组.对照组使用传统持续湿化方法,观察组使用间断气道湿化方法,比较两组患者气道湿化效果、吸痰次数、血氧饱和度、肺部感染发生率及不良反应发生情况之间的差异.结果 观察组患者气道湿化效果优于对照组,吸痰次数少于对照组,血氧饱和度高于对照组,肺部感染及不良反应发生率低于对照组,其差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.结论 间断气道湿化技术能更有效地对患者气道进行湿化,提高患者呼吸道排痰能力,降低肺部感染和相关并发症的发生率.
Objective To analyze the effect of different airway moist mode in the nursing of patients with trachea cut. Methods 80 patients with trachea cut were divided into objective group and control group. The objective group used intermittent airway moist mode and the control group used conventional continuous airway moist mode. The differences of airway moist effect, the time of sputum suction, the blood oxygen saturation and the incidence of pulmonary infection between the two groups were compared. Results There were more positive result in the comparison of airway moist effect in the objective group than that in the control group. The time of sputum suction was less in the objective group, and the blood oxygen saturation was higher. The incidence of pulmonary infection and adverse reactions of the objective group were lower than that in the control group, with statistical significance （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion It would get a satisfactory effect to use intermittent airway moist mode in the nursing of patients with trachea cut, with the better clinical effect and the less pulmonary infection and adverse reactions.
出处
《黑龙江医学》
2014年第2期181-182,共2页
Heilongjiang Medical Journal
关键词
气道湿化
气管切开
护理
效果比较
Airway moist
Trachea cut
Nursing
Effect analysis
