期刊文献+

腰椎间盘突出症后路椎间植骨融合疗效观察与并发症分析 被引量:1

Posterior approach intervertebral fusion in treatment lumbar disc herniation: analysis of efficacy and complications
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的观察经后路椎间植骨融合治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效和并发症。方法将76例腰椎间盘突出症患者纳入研究对象,均采用经后路椎间植骨融合治疗,观察手术相关指标、机体功能、手术并发症等情况。结果 76例患者手术时间(121.4±17.2)min,术中出血量(132.8±20.4)ml,术后引流量(71.1±12.2)ml,术后卧床时间(5.9±1.3)d,疼痛数字评分指数(numerical rating scale,NRS)(3.2±0.6);术后3、6、9、12个月Oswestry功能障碍指数ODI分别是28.8±4.1、25.5±2.9、19.4±3.2、13.8±2.0,均明显低于手术前;手术过程中出现硬脊膜撕裂6例(7.89%),神经损伤2例(2.63%),术中cage位置不佳6例(7.89%);术后发生cage移位或深陷7例(9.21%),切口感染2例(2.63%)。结论经后路椎间植骨融合治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效肯定,但存在手术并发症发生的可能性,应引起足够的重视。 Objective To analyze efficacy and complications after posterior approach intervertebral fusion in treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Methods Lumbar disc herniation patients underwent conventional posterior approach lumbar intervertebral fusion. Operation related index, body function, and complication were observed. Results In 76 patients, operation time was (121.4±17.2) h, intraoperative blood loss (132.8±20.4) ml, postoperative drainage (71.1±12.2)ml, postoperative bed time (5.9±1.3) d, NRS score (3.2±0.6).After 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months postoperatively,Oswestry disability index ODI 28.8±4.1、25.5±2.9、19.4±3.2、13.8±2.0 were lower than that before the operation.Dural tear occurred in 6 cases (7.89%), nerve damage in 2 cases (2.63%), intraoperative cage poor position 6 cases (7.89%), postoperative cage shift 7 cases (9.21%), and infection of incision 2 cases (2.63%). Conclusions Posterior approach lumbar intervertebral fusion for treatment of lumbar disc herniation has sure clinical curative effect, but there is the possibility of surgical complications;clinical enough attention should be paid.
出处 《武警医学》 CAS 2014年第2期173-175,共3页 Medical Journal of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force
关键词 腰椎间盘突出症 植骨融合 机体功能 并发症 lumbar disc herniation inlervertebral fusion body function complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Watanabe K,Yamazaki A,Morita O,et al.Clinical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar foraminal stenosis:preoperative diagnosis and surgical strategy[J].J Spinal Tech,2011,24(3):137-141.
  • 2王宁华.疼痛定量评定的进展[J].中国临床康复,2002,6(18):2738-2739. 被引量:479
  • 3Falrbank J C,Pynsent P B.The Oswestry disability index[J].Spine,2000,25(22):2940-2952.
  • 4唐俊,黄克.后路椎间融合钉棒系统内固定与传统手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床对比分析[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2012,9(1):51-52. 被引量:12
  • 5陈艳勤,杨娟,叶敏,刘茜.腰椎间盘术后早期马尾神经功能障碍的护理[J].武警医学,2012,23(9):813-814. 被引量:2
  • 6Tomoyuki H,Kciichi S,Masahiro K,et al.Clinical results of single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the brantigan I/F carbon cage filled with a mixture of local morselized bone and bioactive ceramic granules[J].Spine,2002,27(3):258-262.
  • 7Brantigan J W,Steffce A D,Lewis M L,et al.Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and variable pedicle screw placement system:two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial[J].Spine,2000,25(12):1437-1446.
  • 8Kuslich S D,Danielson G,Dowdle J D,et al.Four-year follow-up results of lumbar spine arthrodesis using the Bagby and Kuslich lumbar fusion cage[J].Spine,2000,25(20):2656-2662.
  • 9侯秀伟,吴广良,杨贺军,胡军华,高利峰,徐永辉,裴勇,吴铁男.腰椎管狭窄症减压内固定椎间融合术的近期并发症(附195例分析)[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2012,20(11):1053-1054. 被引量:13

二级参考文献27

  • 1何二兴,黄文铎,陈志峰.腰椎手术后脑脊液漏的防治[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,1996,6(5):221-222. 被引量:13
  • 2叶桂峰,林其仁.新材料与技术在腰椎滑脱症外科手术中的应用[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2007,11(1):148-151. 被引量:8
  • 3李时军.腰椎间盘髓核摘除手术中神经损伤的原因分析(附4例报告)[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,17(8):638-639. 被引量:6
  • 4[1]FISAHMAN B,PASTERNAK S,WALLENSTEIN SL,et al.The memorial pain assessment card[J].Cancer,1987,60:1151- 1158.
  • 5[2]RHIND VM,BIRD NA, WRIGHT V.A comparison of clinical assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis[J].Annals of the Rheumatic Disease,1980,39:135- 137.
  • 6[3]HUSKISSON EC,JONE J,SCOTT PJ.Application of visual analogue scales to the measurement of functional capacity[J].Rheumatology and Rehabilitation,1976,15:185- 187.
  • 7[4]DOWNIE WW,LEATHAM PA,RHIND VM.Studies with pain rating scales[J].Annals of the Rheumatics Diseases,1978, 37: 378- 381.
  • 8[5]WILKIE D,LOVEJOY N,DODD M,et al.Cancer pain intensity measurement:concurrent validity of three tools- finger dynameter,pain intensity number scale, visual analogue scale[J].Hospice Journal,1990, 6:1- 13.
  • 9[6]MARCHAND S,BUSHNELL MC,DUNCAN GH.Modulation of heat pa- in perception by high frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)[J].Clinical Journal of Pain,1991,1: 122- 129.
  • 10[7]PRICE DD,BUSH FM,LONG S,et al.A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scale[J].Pain,1994, 56: 217- 226.

共引文献502

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部