期刊文献+

2种含铁物质对底泥中砷的固化效果 被引量:4

Immobilization Effects of Iron-containing Materials on Arsenic in Sediment
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究通过向砷污染底泥中添加FeCl3和Fe(OH)。作为稳定剂,通过五步连续提取法来评鉴其固化效果。结果表明:(1)0.5~5g/kg的FeCl3(以Fe计)使底泥的pH降低了0.01~0.65个单位,而0.5~5g/kg的Fe(OH)。使底泥pH升高0.05~0.11个单位。(2)FeCl3和Fe(OH)。均能降低底泥中交换态砷(A—As)含量,与对照相比,最大添加量(5g/kg)分别使A—As降低了85.71%和10.38%。此外,FeCl3显著降低了底泥中Al—As和ca—As含量,增加了Fe—As含量,对R—As的影响不明显。而Fe(OH)。降低了底泥中Fe—As含量,增加了Ca—As和R—As含量,对Al—As的影响不明显。(3)FeCl3明显降低了底泥中As的TCLP毒性浸出量,而Fe(OH)。却使底泥中As的TCLP毒性浸出量微略增加。综上,FeCl3对固化底泥中的砷具有较好的效果。 A stabilization experiment was conducted in this study, two ferrous materials(FeCl3 and Fe(OH)3 ) were added to the arsenic-contaminated sediment and the sequential extraction procedure was tested to examine the immobilization effects of FeCI3 and Fe(OH)3 on arsenic in sediment. The results showed that: (1)In the addition amounts of FeCI3 (0.5-5 g/kg), the pH value of sediment reduced by 0.01-0.65. But in the same addition amounts of Fe(OH)a, the pH value of sediment increased by 0.05-0.11. (2)FeCI3 and Fe(OH)3 both reduced active arsenic(A-As) contents in sediment. When the addition amount reached the maximum 5 g/kg, compared with the control, FeCl3 and Fe(OH)3 reduced the active As(A-As) by 85.71%, 10.38%, respectively. Moreover, FeCl3 significantly reduced the contents of Al-bound As(A1-As) and Ca-bound As (Ca-As) and increased Fe-bound As(Fe-As) content, but had no obvious effect on R-As. However, Fe (OH)3 reduced the Fe-As content, but increased the Ca-bound As(Ca-As) and residual As(R-As) content and had no obvious effects on Al-bound As (Al-As). (3) Compared with the control group, the leaching toxicity of arsenic decreased obviously with FeCI3 treatment and increased slightly with Fe(OH)3. So, the FeCl3 was the effective immobilizers to remediate arsenic-contaminated sediment.
出处 《水土保持学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期253-256,共4页 Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
基金 国家科技重大专项"水体污染控制与治理"(2010ZX07212-008)
关键词 底泥 含铁物质 固砷 砷形态 TCLP sediment ferrous materials solid arsenic TCLP
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Hossain M B, Jahiruddin M, PanauIlah G M, et al. Spatial variability of arsenic concentration in soils and plants, and its relationship with iron, manganese and phosphorus[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2008,156 (3) : 739-744.
  • 2李宇.湘江武水河沿岸稻田的砷毒危害调查及对策[J].中国环境监测,2006,22(1):85-87. 被引量:5
  • 3马德毅,王菊英.中国主要河口沉积物污染及潜在生态风险评价[J].中国环境科学,2003,23(5):521-525. 被引量:197
  • 4Voigt D E, Brantley S L. Chemical fixation of arsenic in contaminated soils[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 1996,11(5) :633-643.
  • 5Moore T J, Rightmire C M, Vempati R t4. Ferrous iron treatment of soils contaminated with arsenic-containing wood- preserving solution[J]. Soil and Sediment Contamination, 2000,9 (4) : 375-405.
  • 6Hartley W,Edwards R,Lepp N W. Arsenic and heavy metal mobility in iron oxide-amended contaminated soils as evaluated by short- and long-term leaching tests[J]. Environ. Pollut. , 2004,131 (3):495-504.
  • 7文武,曾敏,罗岳平,毕军平,周航,廖柏寒.含铁材料和稀土材料对矿区土壤As的固定效果[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(5):200-202. 被引量:3
  • 8United States Environmental Protection Agency(US EPA). Test methods for evaluating solid waste, SW-846 method 1311 [M]. 3rd edi. Washington D. C. : Government Printing Office, 1992.
  • 9MengX, Korfiatis G P, Bang S, et al. Combined effects of anions on arsenic removalby iron hydroxides [J].Toxicology Letters,2002,133(1) :103-111.
  • 10陈静,王学军,朱立军.pH对砷在贵州红壤中的吸附的影响[J].土壤,2004,36(2):211-214. 被引量:38

二级参考文献103

共引文献357

同被引文献78

引证文献4

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部