期刊文献+

动态拨备、金融风险与经济周期--基于DSGE模型的分析 被引量:11

Dynamic provisioning,Financial Risk and Economic Cycle Based on DSGE Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 宏观审慎监管旨在降低宏观金融风险,平滑经济周期,其中巴塞尔协议Ⅲ中的动态拨备监管可以起到类似资本缓冲的作用。本文利用含金融中介的动态随机一般均衡模型(DSGE)研究前瞻型拨备规则及后顾型拨备规则和经济波动之间的相互作用。结果表明,前瞻型拨备在周期内较为平滑,持有更多的预期拨备可降低经济的顺周期性;传导渠道的分析表明,拨备类型、贷款拨备率会直接或间接的影响到不良贷款率和贷款利率,进而对金融体系和实体经济的顺周期性造成影响;在考虑逆周期资本监管的情形下,前瞻型拨备可进一步降低顺周期性,其幅度有赖于参数的选择。 Macro-prudential regulation is designed to reduce macro-financial risks and smooth the economic cycle. In that aspect, dynamic provisioning in Basel ~ can play a similar role as regu- latory capital buffers. This paper studies backward-looking provisioning, forward-looking provisio- ning rules and their interactions with economic fluctuations using dynamic stochastic general equilib- rium model (DSGE) with financial intermediaries. The findings show that the provisioning in the forward-looking is smoother, and more provision is expected to reduce pro-cyclicality of economy; transmission channel analysis shows that the type of loan loss provisioning has a direct or indirect impact on the NPL ratio and loan interest rates. Thus, the financial system and the economy pro- cyclical are affected. Considering counter-cyclical capital regulation, forward-looking provisioning can further reduce pro-cyclical, and its magnitude depends on the choice of parameters.
出处 《现代财经(天津财经大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期29-41,共13页 Modern Finance and Economics:Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(11JYB3001) 教育部人文社会科学基金项目(13YJA790038)
关键词 动态拨备 金融风险 经济周期 逆周期缓冲 DSGE forwardqooking provisioning backward-looking provisioning countercycli-cal capital requirement
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Agenor P R, Zilberman R. Loan Loss Provisioning Rules, Procyclicality, and Financial Volatility[R]. Economics, The Univeristy of Manchester, 2018.
  • 2Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Models and Tools for Macroprudential Analysis[R]. Work- ing Paper No. 21, Bank for International Settle- ments, 2012.
  • 3Bouvatier V, Lepetit L. Banks' procyclical behavior: Does provisioning matter? [J]. Journal of interna- tional financial markets, institutions and money, 2008, 18(5): 513--526.
  • 4Bouvatier V, Lepetit L. Provisioning rules and bank lending : A theoretical model[J]. Journal of Financial Stability, 2012, 8(1): 25--31.
  • 5Gambacorta L, Signoretti F M. Should monetary policy lean against the wind? [J]. An analysis based on a DSGE model with banking. 2012.
  • 6Iacoviello M. House prices, borrowing constraints, and monetary policy in the business cycle, The A- merican economic review, Vol. 95(No. 3),2005:739 --764.
  • 7Merola R. Optimal monetary policy in a small open economy with financial frictions. Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies,2010.
  • 8Suh H. Macroprudential policy: its effects and rela- tionship to monetary policy, 2012.
  • 9陈昆亭,龚六堂.粘滞价格模型以及对中国经济的数值模拟——对基本RBC模型的改进[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006,23(8):106-117. 被引量:154
  • 10封北麟.资产价格波动与货币政策反应[M].经济科学出版社,2004:30-213.

二级参考文献289

共引文献2189

同被引文献99

引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部