期刊文献+

社会群体中观点的信任、演化与共识 被引量:21

Trust,evolution,and consensus of opinions in a social group
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对连续观点动力学模型中缺乏对个体信任及其观点的不同权重的考虑,本文通过扩展HegselmannKrause模型,引入个体间的信任度和观点间的相似度,将有限信任假设扩展为有限影响假设,建立带权重的观点更新模型,以研究社会群体中少数的偏执个体和权威个体对观点形成、演化以及共识构建过程的影响.仿真结果表明,这两类个体的初始观点尽量接近观点分布区间中点0.5或者增加偏执个体的影响阈值和权威个体的可信任程度可以使群体形成更少和更大的观点簇.随着偏执个体的影响阈值增加,最大簇的观点位置集中于0.5附近;而增加权威个体的可信任程度,最大簇的观点不断接近权威个体的最终观点.模型结果能够在一定程度上反映和解释现实社会中偏执个体和权威个体现象. Most dynamical models with continuous opinion lack the considerations of trust between individuals and difierent weights of opinions. This article extends the Hegselmann-Krause model by introducing the trust between individuals and the similarity between opinions, and extending the hypothesis of bounded confidence to bounded infiuence. Finally,the model of opinion updating with weights is proposed. We have studied the formation, evolution of opinions in a social group and consensus-building process under the infiuence of a few of narrow-minded and authoritative individuals.Simulation results show that decreases of the difierence between the initial opinions of two types of individuals and the midpoint of distribution range(0.5), or increases of the infiuence thresholds of narrow-minded individuals and the trust degree of authoritative individuals would form larger and fewer opinion clusters. As the infiuence thresholds of narrow-minded individuals increases, the opinion of maximum cluster concentrates at near 0.5, but the trust degree of authoritative individuals will increases to make the opinion of maximum cluster constantly approach the final opinion of authoritative individuals. These results can refiect and explain the realistic social phenomenon with narrow-minded individuals and authoritative individuals to a certain extent.
出处 《物理学报》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期36-43,共8页 Acta Physica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(批准号:61374185)资助的课题~~
关键词 观点动力学 共识 分歧 有界影响 观点演化 opinion dynamics consensus/dissent bounded infiuence opinion evolution
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Xia H X,Wang H L,Xuan Z G 2011 Intenational Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science 2 72.
  • 2Castellano C,Fortunato S,Loreto V 2009 Reviews of Modern Physics 81 591.
  • 3Lorenz J 2007 International Journal of Modern Physics C 18 1819.
  • 4Galam S,Gefen Y,Shapir Y 1982 J.Math.Sociol.9 1.
  • 5Galam S,Moscovici S 1991 Eur.J.Soc.Psychol.21 49.
  • 6Holley R,Liggett T 1975 Ann.Probab.3 643.
  • 7Slanina F,Lavi?ka H 2003 Eur.Phys.J.B 35 279.
  • 8Galam S 2002 Eur.Phys.J.B 25 403.
  • 9Nowak A,Szamrej J,Latané B 1990 Psychol.Rev.97 362.
  • 10Lewenstein M,Nowak A,Latané B 1992 Phys.Rev.A 45 763.

同被引文献165

  • 1王承璐.态度改变的认知说服途径分析[J].上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1987,16(3):99-104. 被引量:6
  • 2Hollot,C.V..ON ROBUST STABILITY OF POLYNOMIALS AND RELATED TOPICS[J].Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences,1992,5(1):42-54. 被引量:1
  • 3戴维·迈尔斯著.(侯玉波,乐国安,张智勇,等译.)社会心理学[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2006:208-238.
  • 4LORENZ J. Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: a survey[J]. International Journal of Modem Physics C, 2007, 18(12): 1819-1838.
  • 5w FOLL-MER H. Random economies with many interacting agents[J]. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1974, 1(1): 51-62.
  • 6NOWAK A, SZAMREJ J, LATANE B. From private attitude to public opinion: a dynamic theory of social impact[J]. Psychological Review, 1990(97): 362-376.
  • 7SZNAJD-WERON K, SZNAJD J[J]. International Journal of Modem Physics C, 2000(11): 1157-1165.
  • 8GUILLAUME D, NEAU D, AMBLARD F. Mixing beliefs among interacting agents[J]. Advances in Complex System, 2000(3): 87-98.
  • 9HEGSELMANN R, KRAUSE U. Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation[J]. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2002, 5(3): 1-24.
  • 10SI Xia-meng, LIU Yun, XIONG Fei, et al. Effects of selective attention on continuous opinions and discrete decisions[J]. Physica A, 2010, 389(18): 3711-3719.

引证文献21

二级引证文献126

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部