摘要
本文从陶质、陶色和器型统计出发,将马坡H1器物群置于庙底沟二期和龙山时期的时空背景内,分别与庙底沟二期组和龙山组进行比较。通过系统的比较,发现马坡H1器物群兼有庙底沟二期和龙山时期的文化特点,进而认为马坡H1遗存是庙底沟二期文化的一个地域类型,称为马坡类型,其年代为庙底沟二期文化最晚阶段。马坡H1器物群与客省庄二期和杏花村四期遗存的形成有密切关系,是两者文化因素的来源之一。
This paper compares the ceramic assemblage of H1 at Mapo to that of the Miaodigou Phase II and Longshan period based upon the statistic study of ceramic texture, color, and typology with an aimto contextualize the rmte- rials excavated recently. The study shows the assemblage of Mapo HI presents certain cultural characteristics belonging to both the Miaodiguo Phase II and Longshang Culture. Thus, retrains from Mapo H1 should belong to a regional variation, or the Mapo type of the Mlaodigou culture. Chronologically, the remains are dated to the latest period of the Miaodigou Phase 11 culture, Given the fact that the assemblage of ill shares ghuacun Phase IV, certain cultural elements of the Maopo considerable similarities with the Keshenziauang Phase II and Xin- type might derive from these two cultures mentioned above.
出处
《考古与文物》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第1期16-26,共11页
Archaeology and Cultural Relics
关键词
马坡H1
庙底沟二期
地域类型
H1 at Mapo Miaodigou Phase II Regional variation
