期刊文献+

中国滨海湿地退化评估 被引量:34

Evaluation of coastal wetland degradation in China
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 依据定量化目标和相应的资料获得性,确定了滨海湿地退化评估的8个指标,并对指标的估值方法作了规定,将滨海湿地的退化划分为5个等级。对我国28个滨海湿地区段的退化状况进行估值,属严重退化的4个、中度退化的14个、轻度退化的10个。导致我国滨海湿地退化的主要原因,包括了气候变化、海洋灾害等自然过程为主导的因素,也包括了海岸带围垦、海岸工程建筑、生物资源过度利用、环境污染等人为作用为主的因素。据此,缓解滨海湿地退化、改善滨海湿地环境的主要对策应包括制度体制的完善、自然保护区的建设、管理体系的协调发展、生态补偿制度的建立等。 According to the quantified goal and the acquirability of corresponding data, we determined 8 indicators for evaluating coastal wetland degradation,and defined the evaluation method. The coastal wetland degradation was divided into 5 levels. Twenty eight areas of coastal wetland in China were evaluated,and 4,14 and 10 areas belonged respectively to be seriously degraded,moderately degraded and lightly degraded. The main reasons leading to coastal wetlands degradation in China involved natural factors,such as climate change and marine disasters,etc. and also involved human activities,such as coastal reclamation,coastal engineering,over-exploitation of biological resources,environmental pollution and so on. Hereby,the main countermeasures to mitigate degradation and improve the environment of coastal wetland should include the improvement of system institution,construction of nature reserves, coordinated development of management system,and establishment of ecological compensation system.
出处 《海洋通报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期112-119,共8页 Marine Science Bulletin
基金 山东省优秀中青年科学家奖励基金(BS2010HZ021) 海洋公益性行业科研专项(201105020)
关键词 滨海湿地 退化 评估 coastal wetlands degradation evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Brinson M M, 1994. Developing an approach for assessing the functions of wetlands. In Mitseh(ed). Global Wetlands Old world and new. Elsevier, 615-624.
  • 2Croft M V, Chow-Fraser P, 2007. Use and development of the wetland macrophyte index to detect water quality impairment in fish habitat of Great Lakes coastal marshes. Journal of Great Lakes Restoration, 33 ($3): 172-197.
  • 3Hargiss C L M, DeKeyser E S, Kirby D R, et al, 2008. Regional as- sessment of wetland plant communities using the index of plant com- munity integrity. Ecological Indicators, 8(3) : 303-307.
  • 4Larson Joseph S, 1994. Rapid assessment of wetlands: history and ap- plication to management. In Mitsch(ed). Global wetlands: Old world and new. Elsevier, 623-636.
  • 5Lougheed V L, Chow-Fraser P, 2002. Development and use of a zoo- plankton index of wetland quality in the Laurentian Great Lakes Basin. Ecological Applications, 12(2): 474-486.
  • 6Malthy E, 1994. Building a new approach to the investigation and as- sessment of wetland Ecosystem functioning. In Mitsch (ed). Global wetlands: Old world and new. Elsevier, 637-658.
  • 7Micacchion M, 2002. Amphibian Index of Biotic Integrity (AmphIBI) for Wetlands. Final Report to US EPA Grant No.CD985875-01 Columbus : Wetland Ecology Group, Division of Surface Water.
  • 8Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005a. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, D C.: Island Press, World Resources Institute.
  • 9Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005b. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Wetlands and Water Synthesis. Washington, D C.: Island Press, World Resources Institute.
  • 10Murphy K I, 1994. Biotic indicators of riverine wetland ecosystem func- tioning. In Mitsch(ed). Global wetlands: Old world and new. Else- vier, 659-682.

二级参考文献100

共引文献272

同被引文献666

引证文献34

二级引证文献327

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部