期刊文献+

基本国策与社会生态运动的比较分析 被引量:3

Comparative Analysis Between Basic State Policy and Social Ecological Movement
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 国策机制从根本上来说是行政主导的环境资源保护路径,它有自己的优势,特别是在特定时期的优势,但也存在局限性。国策机制对公众具有神秘性和对立性。西方的社会生态运动最早得到的是社会认可,其次得到了法律的认可,成为环境立法、司法和行政的源泉。社会生态运动初期的效率可能是较低的,而一旦它被公众所认可,会形成全社会的自觉行动;国策机制在初期其效率远高于社会生态运动,但是它在公众中的影响力是有限的,甚至会造成公众对环境问题的冷漠。中国的环境资源保护要突破固有的行政主导的局限,需实现从国策上升到法律的转变,需要加强社会生态运动的理论和制度建设,并注重国际交流和与本国国情适应的经验借鉴,逐渐使社会生态运动在中国实现其对司法、立法和行政的影响。 State policy mechanism is fundamentally the leading administrative path of environment and re- sources protection. It has its own advantages, especially in certain period, but the limitations are also obvi- ous. State policy mechanism seems to be mysterious and opposite to the public. The ecological movement in western society first got social acceptance and then got the legal recognition as the source of environmental legislation, jurisdiction and administration. The efficiency of early social ecological movement may be low at first, but once approved by the public, it can become the action of social consciousness. The efficiency of early state policy mechanism is much higher than that of social ecological movement, but its public influence is limited, and may even cause the public neglect of the inherent limitations of administrative dominance, environmental problems. To make a breakthrough of China's environmental protection need to promote the change from state policy to law, need to strengthen the social ecological movement by the construction of theory and system, and pay attention to the international communication and local application of foreign ex- perience, and make the social ecological movement influence China in the jurisdiction, legislation and ad- ministration.
作者 周珂
出处 《北京城市学院学报》 2014年第1期23-29,共7页 Journal of Beijing City University
基金 德国罗莎卢森堡基金会项目"中欧气候变化与社会生态运动比较"研究成果
关键词 基本国策 社会生态运动 法制 basic state policy . social ecological movement legal system
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Burstein, Paul. Social Movements and Public Policy [A ]. Marco Giugni, Doug McAdam, and Charles Tilly, eds. How Social Movements Matter [ C ]. Min- neapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. 1999.
  • 2Tanja A. B? rzel. Participation Through Law Enforce- ment : The Case of the European Union [ J]. Compar- ative Political Studies, 2006 (39) : 128 -152.
  • 3周穗明.西方生态运动的政治分野与生态社会主义的当代发展[J].当代世界与社会主义,1997(1):36-39. 被引量:11
  • 4公众环境意识跟不上趟[N].工商时报,2000-6-16.
  • 5周穗明.西方新社会运动与中国:历史、反思与现实[J].当代世界社会主义问题,2008(4):89-95. 被引量:7
  • 6Mark Thatcher and Alee Stone Sweet. Theory and Prac- tice of Delegation to non-majoritarian Institutions [J] . West European Politics, 2002 (25) : 1 - 22.
  • 7Lawrence Wilde. Modem European Socialism [ M ]. A1-dershot: Dartmouth Publishing House, 1994.
  • 8Russell J. Dalton, Steve Recchia and Robert Rohrschnei- der. The Environmental Movement and the Modes of Po- litical Action [ J ]. Comparative Political Studies, 2003 (36) : 743 -771.
  • 9刘大椿 岩佐茂.环境思想研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1998.42.
  • 10徐涤宇,潘泊.私法自治的变迁与民法中“人”的深化[J].华东政法学院学报,2004(6):22-30. 被引量:23

二级参考文献11

共引文献64

同被引文献40

引证文献3

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部