期刊文献+

髋臼后方包容角对髋臼后壁骨折稳定性评估的临床应用 被引量:1

Clinical use of posterior acetabular arc angle in evaluation of stability in posterior wall acetabulum fracture
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨髋臼后方包容角值这一新指标对髋臼后壁骨折稳定性评估的临床应用。方法对34例单侧髋臼后壁骨折健侧的CT影像资料进行测量,估算出髋臼后壁完整和骨折20%、50%时髋臼后方包容角的大小,并利用该值对髋臼后壁骨折进行稳定性判定。通过组内相关系数(ICC)对髋臼后方包容角测量的稳定性进行评估,并将利用该方法进行髋臼后壁骨折稳定性判定的结果与传统Keith法进行比较。结果髋臼后壁完整和骨折20%、50%时髋臼后方包容角分别为(92.47±10.96)°、(74.30±9.5)°、(52.57±6.27)°不同测量者之间的ICC值为0.977~0.996,不同时间的ICC值为0.977~0.996,利用髋臼后方包容角法对髋臼后壁骨折稳定进行判定的结果与利用Keith法的结果之间的Kappa值为0.816。经髋臼后方稳定性试验判定,两者的准确率分别为84.2%和76.5%,差异无统计学意义(x^2=0.343,P=0.558〉0.05)。结论髋臼后方包容角测量时具有较高的稳定性,利用该方法对髋臼后壁骨折稳定性进行判定的结果与传统的Keith法一致性好,并且该方法简便、临床应用性强。 Objective To discuss the clinical use of the posterior acetabular arc angle in evaluation of the stability in posterior wall acetabulum fracture. Methods The posterior acetabular arc angle in intact, 20% and 50% defects of posterior acetabular walls was measured and used for the evaluation of the stability in 34 cases of unilateral posterior wall acetabulum fracture. The constancy of the measurements was assesed by inter-and intraobserver error with an intraelass correlation coefficient (ICC). Agreement of result between the new method and the Keith method (Kappa value) was calculated and the accuracy rates were compared. Results The posterior acetabtdar arc angle in intact, 20% and 50% defects of posterior acetabular walls were (92.47±10.96)°, (74.30±9.5)° and (52.57±.27)° respectively. The ICCs among two observers were 0.977-0.996 and the ICCs of the ame observer in different times were 0.977-0.998. The Kappa value was 0.816 between the two methods. The accuracy rates of the new method and the Keith method was 84.2% and 76.5% acco,'ding to the dynamic stress examination under anesthesia (X^2 =0.343,P =0.558 〉0.05). Conclusion The measurement of posterior acetabular arc angle is easy to practice and has a good constancy. The judge in the stability in posterior wall acetabulum fracture of the two methods coincides with each other with a Kappa value of 0.816. Although the accuracy rate of the new method is higher than the Keith method but it is not supported by statistical analysis results. It should be recommended for its practicability.
出处 《中国骨与关节损伤杂志》 2014年第2期105-107,共3页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
关键词 髋臼骨折 稳定性 CT 髋臼后方包容角 Acetabulum fracture Stability Computed tomography Posterior acetabular arc angle
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1鲍哲明,蔡筑韵,石长贵,苏佳灿,张坤.髋臼骨折致伤因素及术后并发症研究进展[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2010,25(12):1149-1151. 被引量:8
  • 2Moed BR,Ajibade DA,Israel H. Computed tomography as a predictor of hip stability status in posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum[J].{H}Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma,2009,(1):7-15.
  • 3Keith JE,Brashear HR,Guilford WB. Stability of posterior fracturedislocations of the hip.Quantitative assessment using computed tomography[J].{H}Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume,1988,(5):711-714.
  • 4Grimshaw CS,Moed BR. Outcomes of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum treated nonoperatively after diagnostic screening with dynamic stress examination under anesthesia[J].{H}Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume,2010,(17):2792-2800.
  • 5Hatch WV,Flanagan JG,Williams-Lyn DE. Interobserver agreement of Heidelberg retina tomograph parameters[J].{H}Journal of Glaucoma,1999,(4):232-237.
  • 6Landis JR,Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data[J].{H}BIOMETRICS,1977,(1):159-174.
  • 7陈富强,沈珊安,葛旻,赵帅,潘峥.髋臼骨折的治疗体会[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2011,26(8):714-715. 被引量:14
  • 8刘列,张永刚,宋宁亚,肖文兴,杨军旗,李凯.锁定重建钛板治疗髋臼骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2010,25(4):326-327. 被引量:1
  • 9魏伟明,郑建河,叶握球,杨艳琴,杨周生,张育斌.三维CT重建影像增加髋臼骨折分型的可靠性[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2012,27(6):514-515. 被引量:17
  • 10Reagan JM,Moed BR. Can computed tomography predict hip stability in posterior wall acetabular fractures[J].{H}Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,2011,(7):2035-2041.

二级参考文献21

  • 1王先泉,张进禄,周东生.髋臼后柱支持钢板的临床解剖学研究[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2005,20(1):9-11. 被引量:31
  • 2邱贵兴,戴魁戎.骨科手术学.第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007.477.
  • 3Shazar N ,Brumback RJ, Novak VP,et al.Biomechanica levaluation of transverse acetabular fracture fixation.Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998,352:215.
  • 4Karunakar MA,Goulet JA,Mueller KL,et al.Operative treatment of unstable pediatric pelvis and acetabular frac tures.J Pediatr Orthop, 2005,25(1):34.
  • 5Malkani AL,Voor MJ,Rennirt G,et al.Increased peak contactstress after incongruent reduction of transverse acetabular fractures:a cadaveric model.J Trauma,2001,4:704.
  • 6戴尅戎,现代关节外科学.北京:科学出版社,2007:875.
  • 7Helfet DL,Schmeling GJ. Management of complex acetabular fractures through single nenextensile exposures. Clin Orthop, 1994,305: 58-68.
  • 8Pascarella R, Mareaqa A,Reggiani LM, etal. Intra-articular fragments in acetabular fracture-dislocation[J]. Orthopedics, 2009,32(6): 402.
  • 9George P, Petros A, Byron C, et al. Surgically treated acetabular fractures via a single posterior approach with a follow up of 2-10 years[J]. Injury, 2007, 38: 334-343.
  • 10Koo H,Leveridge M,Mckee MD,et al.Intembserver reliability of the young-burgess and tile classification systems for fractures of the pelvic ring[J]. J Orthop Trauma,2008, 22(6): 379-384.

共引文献34

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部