期刊文献+

头孢噻肟钠与培菲康联合治疗肝硬化自发性腹膜炎的疗效分析 被引量:6

The clinical effect of cefotaxime sodium and bifid triple viable in treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis of liver cirrhosis
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的分析头孢噻肟钠联合培菲康治疗肝硬化自发性腹膜炎(spontaneous bacterial peritonitis,SBP)的临床疗效和不良反应。方法选取西安市第四医院就诊的84例肝硬化SBP患者,依据治疗方案不同分为:研究组41例,应用头孢噻肟钠联合培菲康治疗;对照组43例,仅应用头孢噻肟钠治疗。两组疗程均为14 d,比较两组患者临床疗效及不良反应的差异。结果与对照组相比,研究组的显效率、有效率及总有效率显著较高(P<0.05),发热、腹痛、腹胀、腹部压痛及腹水菌群等临床表现缓解时间明显较短(P<0.05),且肝功能衰竭、低血压性休克及病死率显著减少(P<0.05)。结论头孢噻肟钠联合培菲康治疗肝硬化SBP疗效显著,不良反应少。 Objective To analyze the clinical effect and side effect of cefotaxime sodium and bifid triple viable in treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) of liver cirrhosis. Methods 84 patients with SBP of liver cirrhosis in the Fourth Hospital of Xi'an were divided into two groups: research group (41 cases, application with cefotaxime sodium and bifid triple viable) and control group (43 cases, application with cefotaxime sodium only) , based on distinct chemotherapies. The courses of treatment was both 14 days in two groups. The indexes of clinical effect and side effect were compared between two groups. Results Compared with control group, the excellence rate, effective rate and total effective rate in research group were higher (P 〈 0.05) , the remission time of clinical symptoms, such as fever, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, abdominal tenderness and intestinal flora in research group were shorter (P 〈 0.05 ), and the occurrences of hepatic failure, hypotensive shock and mortality rate in research group were lower (P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion The combination of cefotaxime sodium and bifid triple viable is better effective, less side effects and better prognosis in treatment of SBP of liver cirrhosis.
作者 李汀
出处 《胃肠病学和肝病学杂志》 CAS 2014年第2期205-207,共3页 Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
关键词 头孢噻肟钠 双歧三联活菌 肝硬化 自发性腹膜炎 Cefotaxime sodium Bifid triple viable Liver cirrhosis Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献30

  • 1孙艳,孙惠娟,王沐.2001~2005年医院β-内酰胺酶抑制药复合制剂应用分析[J].药物流行病学杂志,2007,16(4):233-235. 被引量:5
  • 2徐芸,冯百岁.消化病学理论与实践[M].郑州:郑州大学出版社,2003:290.
  • 3Tolga Yakar,Mustafa Gü?lü,Ender Serin,Hikmet Al??kan,Erdamar Husamettin.A Recent Evaluation of Empirical Cephalosporin Treatment and Antibiotic Resistance of Changing Bacterial Profiles in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis[J]. Digestive Diseases and Sciences . 2010 (5)
  • 4A. Umgelter,W. Reindl,M. Miedaner,R. M. Schmid,W. Huber.Failure of Current Antibiotic First-Line Regimens and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis[J]. Infection . 2009 (1)
  • 5Heo J,Seo YS,Yim HJ,Hahn T,Park SH,Ahn SH,Park JY,Park JY,Kim MY,Park SK,Cho M,Um SH,Han KH,Kim HS,Baik SK,Kim BI,Cho SH.Clinical features and prognosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in korean pa-tients with liver cirrhosis:a multicenter retrospective study. Gut Liver . 2009
  • 6Felisart,J.,Rimola,A.,Arroyo,V.,Pérez-Ayuso,R. M.,Quintero,E.,Ginès,P.,Rodés,J.Cefotaxime is more effective than is ampicillin-tobramycin in cirrhotics with severe infections. Hepatology . 1985
  • 7PfallerMA,JonesRN.A review ofthein vitro activity ofmempenemand comparative antimicrobial agents tested against 30 254 actableand anaerobic pathogens isolated world wide. Jiagn MicrobiolInfect Dis . 1997
  • 8Tandon B,Garcia-Tsao G.Bacterial infection,sepsis,andmultiorgan failure in cirrhosis. Seminars in Liver Disease . 2008
  • 9Taskiran B,Colakoglu O,Sozmen B, et al.Comparison of cefotaxime and ofloxacin in treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Turk J Gastroenterol . 2004
  • 10Cormican MG,Runyon BA,Jones RN.In vitro activit y of levofloxacin and FK-037 against aerobic isolates fr_om spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Journal of Chemotherapy . 1995

共引文献20

同被引文献48

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部