期刊文献+

大鼠胃黏膜SS、EGF、PGE_2含量在模拟+Gz值暴露下的变化及机制 被引量:5

The rats gastric mucosa SS,EGF,PGE_2 content changes and mechanisms in analog +Gz value exposure
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的观察模拟不同+Gz值暴露对大鼠应激性胃黏膜损伤程度;探讨胃黏膜保护因子胃黏膜中生长抑素(SS)、表皮生长因子(EGF)、前列腺素E2(PGE2)含量及其可能抗损伤机制。方法 40只雄性Wistar大鼠随机分成4组,+Gz暴露方式采用动物离心机模拟+Gz暴露,每组10只同时上机。采用梯形+Gz作用曲线,G值增长率1 G/s,由计算机进行加速度程序控制:A组(对照组):+1 Gz值暴露(n=10),连续暴露5 min;B组:+5 Gz值暴露(n=10),连续暴露5 min;C组:+10 Gz值暴露(n=10),连续暴露5 min;D组:重复暴露组(n=10),+5 Gz值1.5 min,+10 Gz值2 min,+5 Gz值1.5 min。每组下离心机后,光镜下分别观察各组胃黏膜大体损伤程度;制成切片,进行HE染色观察胃黏膜组织病理学改变。放免法检测胃黏膜EGF、SS、PGE2的含量。结果光镜和HE染色观察胃黏膜组织病理学改变显示:胃黏膜损伤程度由轻到重依次为A、B、C、D组,C、D组与A组比较病理损害明显加重。与A组比较,B、C、D组胃黏膜EGF、PGE2的含量显著减少(P<0.05);大鼠胃黏膜中SS含量(ng/mg)明显升高(1.258±0.050、4.775±0.289、6.581±0.479、8.114±0.662)(P<0.05);EGF含量(ng/mg)下降(0.677±0.066、0.472±0.055、0.383±0.031、0.256±0.019)(P<0.05);PGE2水平(ng/mg)减少(6.106±0.640、5.116±0.660、4.510±0.699、3.473±0.337)(P<0.05)。结论越高水平+Gz值暴露对大鼠胃黏膜损伤程度越大;作为保护因子的胃黏膜SS水平反应性增高,同时EGF、PGE2的含量减少。SS、EGF和PGE2在不同+Gz值暴露胃黏膜应激过程中起到重要抗损伤的保护作用。 Objective To observe the degree of stress gastric mueosal injury under the simulate different + Gz value into four groups. + Gz exposure chamber was the animal centrifuge simulation + Gz exposure (n = 10). While on the machine, trapezoidal + Gz effect curve was used, the growth rate of G value was 1 G/s, the computer was used to con- trol acceleration program: A group (control group) : + 1 Gz exposure ( n = 10), continuous exposure to 5 min; B group: +5 Gz value of the exposure (n = 10), continuous exposure to 5 min; C group: + 10 Gz exposure (n = 10) , continuous exposure to 5 min; D group: repeated exposure group (n = 10) , +5 Gz value of 1.5 min + 10 Gz value of 2 min + 5 Gz value of 1.5 min. The degree of gastric mucosa injury was observed under the light microscope ; the pathological changes in gastric mucosa were observed by HE staining. Mucosa EGF, SS and PGE2 contents were detected by radioimmunoassay. Results The degree of gastric mucosal damage from light to heavy turned as groups A, B, C, D; compared with group A, pathological damage were significantly increased in groups C,D. Compared with group A, mucosal EGF, PGE2 levels were significantly decreased in groups B, C, D (P 〈0.05). SS contents (ng/mg) gastric mu- cosawere significantly higher (1.258±0.050, 4.775±0.289, 6.581±0.479, 8.114 +0.662) (P〈0.05); EGF (ng/mg) were decreased (0.677 + 0.066, 0.472 + 0.055, 0.383±0.031,0. 256±0.019) ( P 〈 0.05) ; PGE2 were reduced (ng/mg) (6.106±0.640, 5.116±0.660, 4.510±0.699, 3.473±0.337) (P〈0.05), there werestatisti-cally significance among groups A, B, C, D. Conclusion Simulate different levels of + Gz value exposed to different degree of damage to the rat gastric mucosa; protection factor of SS levels were increased reactivity, EGF and PGE2 con- tent were reduced. The SS, EGF and PGE2 under the + Gz value exposure in rats play important anti injury roles in the process of gastric stress injury.
出处 《胃肠病学和肝病学杂志》 CAS 2014年第2期138-142,共5页 Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
基金 全军十二五后勤科技攻关项目(N0.AKJ11J004)
关键词 +Gz值暴露 胃黏膜 生长抑素 表皮生长因子 前列腺素E2 + Gz value exposure Gastric mucosa Somatostatin Epidermal growth factor Prostaglandin E2
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

二级参考文献173

共引文献140

同被引文献70

  • 1胡伏莲.消化性溃疡发病机制的现代理念[J].中华消化杂志,2005,25(3):189-190. 被引量:257
  • 2刘伟,戎兰.质子泵抑制剂的研究进展[J].临床内科杂志,2006,23(2):80-82. 被引量:22
  • 3李志军,王家泰,吴胜群,宗育杉,王玮,王今达,崔乃杰.血栓素A2与微循环障碍在实验性应激性溃疡中的作用及其防治[J].微循环学杂志,1996,6(2):3-5. 被引量:5
  • 4徐叔云,卞如濂.药理实验方法学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:759.
  • 5Nillson B I. Relationship between interdige stive gallbladder emptying, plasma motilin and migrating motor complex in man [ J ]. Acta Physiol-scand, 1990, 139 (1) :55.
  • 6Robert A, Nezamis JE, Lancaster C, Davis JP, Field SO, Hanchar AJ. Mild irritants prevent gastric necrosis through "adaptive cytoprotection" mediated by prostaglandins. Am ] Physiol 1983, 245:Gl13-G121 [PMID: 6869543].
  • 7Wallace JL, Track NS, Cohen MM. Chronic mild restraint protects the rat gastric mucosa from injury by ethanol or cold restraint. Gastroenterology 1983, 85:370-375 [PMID: 6862160].
  • 8Cathcart MC, O'Byme KJ, Reynolds JV, O'Sullivan J, Pidgeon GP. COX-derived prostanoid pathways in gastrointestinal cancer development and progression: novel targets for prevention and intervention. Biochim Biophys Acta ,2012, 1825:49-63 [PMID: 2,2015819 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.,2011.09.004].
  • 9Guth PH, Aures D, Paulsen G. Topical aspirin plus HC1 gastric lesions in the rat. Cytoprotective effect of prostaglandin, cimetidine, and probanthine. Gastroenterology 1979, 76:88-93 [PMID: 361495].
  • 10Claar D, Hartert TV, Peebles RS. The role of prostaglandins in allergic lung inflammation and asthma. Expert Rev Respir Med ,2015, 9:55-72 [PMID: 25541289 DOI: 10.1586/17476348.,2015.992 783].

引证文献5

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部