摘要
金圣叹评点《水浒传》中存在着诸多矛盾,而这些矛盾与其评点此书并非一时一地所作有着莫大的关联。文章从两部分着手分析金圣叹评点《水浒传》的历时性,第一部分确定金圣叹的批语中确实存在着不同时间段的批语以及分析这些批语可能存在的三个评点阶段,第二部分以金圣叹评点文字的形式为对象,包括三篇序言、读法、一篇伪序、回前总批、眉批、单行夹批,逐一分析金圣叹批点文字中哪些可能是前期的批语,而哪些又可能是后期的批语。
It is argued in this paper that the contradictory annotations,made by JIN Sheng- tan, in ＂The Water Margin＂ should be the result that they were made at different time. The dia- chronic analysis covers two sections ：first, the annotations were made at different period of time and thus could be divided into three stages;second, the stylistic forms are analyzed. There are three prefaces, readings, a false preface, general comments, header annotations, annotations for each line in this version. A detailed analysis may tell which part is made earlier and which art is made later.
出处
《哈尔滨学院学报》
2014年第2期67-71,共5页
Journal of Harbin University
基金
东华理工大学2013年度研究生创新专项资金资助项目
项目编号:DYCB13001
关键词
金圣叹
评点
水浒传
历时性
JIN Shengtan
annotations
＂The Water Margin＂
a diachronic perspective
