期刊文献+

我国上市公司IPO寻租与监管部门的博弈分析 被引量:1

Game Analysis of IPO Rent-seeking of China's Listed Companies and Their Supervising Departments
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 从寻租视角,基于一系列基本假设,构建了上市公司与监管部门的不完全信息动态博弈模型;通过对模型均衡结果的讨论,分析了博弈双方的最优策略,进而提出减少欺诈上市寻租发生的措施和建议。 From the angle of rent-seeking, based on a series of basic suppositions, this paper constructs incomplete information dynamic game model between listed companies and their supervising departments, after the discussing of the equilibrium results of the model, analyzes the optimal strategy of the two parties of the game, and furthermore points out the measures and suggestions for the reduction of the cheating and rent-seeking of the initial public offering of Chinese companies.
出处 《重庆工商大学学报(自然科学版)》 2014年第1期46-52,共7页 Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University:Natural Science Edition
基金 安徽省软科学研究项目(1302053037) 安徽省高校人文社科重点研究基地农科教中心重点项目(SK2013A064)
关键词 上市公司 IPO 寻租 博弈 listed company IPO rent-seeking game
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献23

  • 1黄少安,张岗.中国上市公司股权融资偏好分析[J].经济研究,2001,36(11):12-20. 被引量:978
  • 2王银凤.论证券发行预披露制度[J].证券市场导报,2006(3):4-11. 被引量:4
  • 3(德)柯武刚 史漫飞.制度经济学--社会秩序与公共政策[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001..
  • 4[11]Bhgawati, J.. Directly Unproductive Profit-seeking Activities (DUP).Journal of Political Economy, Oct. 1974.
  • 5[12]Ehrlich, I.. Participation in Illegitimate Activities: A Theoretical and EmpiricalInvestigation. Journal of Political Economy, 1973, (81):521-65.
  • 6[14]Feige, E. L. and R. T. McGee. Tax Revenue Losses and the Unobserved Economy in the UK. Journal of Economic Affairs 1973,(2):164-172.
  • 7[15]Gutmann, P. M.. The Subterranean Economy. Financial Analysts Journal. 1973, (33):24-7, 34.
  • 8[16]Lowery, D. and W. Sigelmann.. Understanding the Tax Revolt:Eight Explanations. American Political Science Review 1973, (75):963-74.
  • 9[18]Ross, I.. Why the Underground Economy is Booming. Fortune 1978,(9): 92-8.
  • 10[19]Spicer, M. and S. Lundstedt. Understanding Tax Evasion. Public Finance. 1973, (2): 295-305.

共引文献53

同被引文献13

  • 1尼古拉斯.拉迪,荣莹曾,常京风.中国经济体制再造[J].经济社会体制比较,1988(2):17-22. 被引量:7
  • 2谢平,陆磊.金融腐败、金融业不良资产与居民资产配置之谜[J].经济导刊,2005(5):56-63. 被引量:2
  • 3张维迎.中国股市是一个“寻租场”[J].当代经济,2007,24(08S):1-1. 被引量:4
  • 4Pagano,Marco,Alisa Rod. TheChoice of Stock Ownership Structure:Agency Costs,Momitoring,and the Decision to Go Public[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1998,(113):187-226.
  • 5Johnson,S,La Porta,R.F. Lopez-De-Silanes.A Shleifer Tunneling[J].American Economic Review,2000,(90):115-128.
  • 6Holdemesa,G. G.A Survey of Blockholders and Corporate Control[J].Economic Policy Review,2003,(09):51-64.
  • 7Cheung,Y.L,P.R.Rau,Stouraitis,A. Tunneling,Propping,and Expropriation:Evidence from Connected Party Transactions in Hong Kong[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2006,(82):343-386.
  • 8Faccio,M. Politically Connected Firms[J].The American Economic Review,2006,(96):369-386.
  • 9Fan,J.P.H,T.J.Wong,Zhang,T. Politically Connected CEOs,Co,orate Govemance,and Poat-IPO Performance Of China's Newly Partially Privatized Finns[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2007,(84):330-357.
  • 10Khwaja,A.I,A.Mian. Do Lenders Favor Politically-Connected Firms.Rent Provision in an Emerging Financial Market[J].Quauterly Journal of Economics,2005,(04):203-247.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部