摘要
《尼各马可伦理学》对"最高善"的规定存在着逻辑上的模糊,这种情形进而又使亚里士多德哲学体系中"praxis(实践)"与"theōria(理论)"间的关系趋于复杂。对"最高善"规定的模糊性概源于亚里士多德与柏拉图的不同叙事风格以及亚里士多德对柏拉图理念论的质疑。此外,praxis和theōria间的张力使得一种隐秘于柏拉图-亚里士多德形而上学开端中实践的哲学成为可能。
The definition of the highest good seems to be vague in the Nicomachean Ehtics, and the rela- tionship between praxis and theoria in the system of Aristotle＇ s philosophy is complicated under this circum- stance. This is not only caused by the differences of the narrative style in Aristotle＇ s and Plato＇ s works, but also caused by the critique of Aristotle to the realism of Plato. Furthermore, the tension of praxis and theoria makes the philosophy of praxis which was hidden in the Metaphysics originated from Plato-Aristotle possible.
出处
《大庆师范学院学报》
2014年第1期8-12,共5页
Journal of Daqing Normal University
基金
黑龙江省2012年度社科研究规划项目课题"价值认同与重建的深度基础研究"(12B004)
2013年度黑龙江省研究生创新科研项目课题"阿伦特的行动思想研究--在亚里士多德的实践哲学传统内"
关键词
最高善
实践
理论
行动
the Highest Good
Praxis
Theoria
Action
