摘要
目的：在大学生群体中引入无聊倾向量表（BoredomPronenessScale，BPS），探讨该量表在中国文化背景下的因素结构，并检验其信效度。方法：采用BPS中文版调查了1230名大学生，收回有效问卷1129份。另用特质孤独量表、特质焦虑量表、自评抑郁量表和自评无聊倾向条目在90名大学生中检验效标关联效度。3周后随机抽取64名大学生进行重测。结果：BPS中文版包括内部刺激和外部刺激2个维度，低卷入、高卷入、高刺激需求、低刺激需求和缺乏耐性5个分量表，共20个条目；验证性因素分析显示数据拟合良好（x2/df=-1．60，CFI=O．91，TLI=O．89，RM．SEA=0．04，SRMR=0．06）；5个分量表的内部一致性信度在0．57—0．81之间，重测信度在0．69—0．83之间；BPS中文版具有较好的效标关联效度。结论：BPS中文版具有良好的信度和效度，可以用于大学生的无聊倾向测量。
Objective： To introduce and investigate the psychometric attributes of the Chinese version of Boredom Proneness Scale（BPS）. Methods： 1230 university students were asked to complete the Chinese version of BPS, in which 90 students were further asked to complete Trait Loneliness Scale, Trait Anxiety Inventory, Self-Rating Depression Scale, and a self-assessment boredom item. 64 students were followed to complete the Chinese version of BPS three weeks after the first investigation. Results： Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded two reliable dimensions in the question- naire： external stimulation and internal stimulation, which contained five factors： low engagement, high engagement, high stimulating requirements, low stimulating requirements and lack of patience, with Cronbach＇ a of these subscales ranged 0.5？ from 0.81; the test-retest reliabilities ranged 0.69 from 0.83. The BPS was of good criterion validity as well. Conclu- sion： The Chinese version of BPS can be used as an effective instrument to assess the boredom status in Chinese university students.
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2014年第1期74-77,73,共5页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金
2012年黑龙江省研究生创新科研项目(YJSCX2012-163HLJ)
关键词
无聊倾向
效度
信度
Boredom pronness
Validity
Reliability
