期刊文献+

成年初期大学生自主结构探索及量表编制 被引量:4

Structure of Autonomy of College Students in Emerging Adulthood
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:编制成年初期(18—25岁)大学生自主量表,验证中国被试的多维自主结构。方法:运用开放式问卷、半结构访谈和内容分析相结合的质性研究方法,与探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析等相结合的量化研究方法,对884名中国大学生进行调查。结果:成年初期大学生自主量表由20个项目构成,包含四个维度(自我主张、自我依靠、自我控制和自我决断)。验证性因素分析表明该量表具有较好的拟合指标(x2/df=2.512,NFI=0.92,NNFI=O.95,CFI=0.95,RMSEA=0.061),总量表及各维度的内部一致性为0.868—0.636,重测信度为0.831—0.703;总分与维度(0.901—0.635)以及各维度间(0.664—0.161)显著相关,总分和各维度与效标GSES(O.528—0.1641显著相关。结论:中国大学生的自主结构是多维的,成年初期大学生自主量表具有良好的信效度。 Objective: To develop College Students' Autonomy Scale in Emerging Aduhhood(CSAS-EA), and to test the multi-dimensional structure of autonomy. Methods: Qualitative research methods, including open questionnaire, semi- structured interview and content analysis, and quantitative research methods, such as exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, were used in this study. 884 Chinese college students aged between 18 and 25 years were surveyed in the re- search. Results: CASA-EA included 20 items and was composed of four dimensions including self-assertion, self-reli- ance, self-control, and self-decision. Confirmatory factor analysis shows the scale had good fit index: ~2/df=-2.512, NFI= 0.92, NNFI=0.95, CFI=0.95, RMSEA=0.061. The internal consistency of CSAS-EA and the four dimensions were 0.868 ~ 0.636, and test-retest coefficients for CSAS-EA was 0.806. There were significant positive correlation between total score and four dimensions(0.901 - 0.635) and among dimensions(0.664 - 0.161). The CSAS-EA total score and four dimensions were significantly correlated with the criterion GSES(0.528 -0.164). Conclusion: The structure of Chinese College stu- dents ' autonomy has a multi-dimensional structure, and good psychometric property.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期64-68,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 湖北省人文社科项目(2008z017) 中国地质大学研究生培养模式与教学改革基金项目(CUGYCXP0809)
关键词 成年初期 自主 结构 大学生 Emerging adulthood Autonomy Structure College students
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Collins WA, Steinberg L. Adolescent development in inter- personal context. In Damon W, Lerner R, Eisenberg N. Ha- ndbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and person- ality development). New York: Wiley, 2006. 1003-1067.
  • 2Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psycholo- gist, 2000, 55(5): 469-480.
  • 3Magolda B. Developing self-authorship in young adult life. Journal of College Student Development, 1998, 39(2): 143- 156.
  • 4Beyers W, Goossens L. Psychological separation and adjust- ment to college: Moderating effects of gender, age, and per- ceived parenting style. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2003, 18(4): 363-382.
  • 5Hmel BA, Pincus AL. The meaning of autonomy: On and be- yond the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality, 2002, 70(3): 277-310.
  • 6Murray HA. Explorations in personality: A clinical and ex- perimental study of fifty men of college age. New York: Ox- ford, 1938.
  • 7Gough H, Heilbrnn AL. The revised adjective checklist ma- nual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983.
  • 8Steinberg L, Silverberg SB. The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Development, 1986, 57(4): 841-851.
  • 9Deci EL, Ryan RM. The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 1985, 19(2): 109-134.
  • 10Wiggins JS. Agency and communion as conceptual coordi- nates for the understanding and measurement of interperson- al behavior. In Meehl PE, Grove W, Cicchetti D. Thinking clearly about psychology:Essays. College of Minnesota Press: Minnesota, 1991.89-113.

二级参考文献46

共引文献343

同被引文献77

  • 1黄希庭,李嫒.大学生自立意识的探索性研究[J].心理科学,2001,24(4):389-392. 被引量:103
  • 2凌辉,黄希庭.6—12岁儿童自立行为结构的初步研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(3):233-236. 被引量:17
  • 3夏凌翔,黄希庭.当代学者对自立认识的概念分析[J].心理科学,2006,29(4):861-867. 被引量:25
  • 4陆洛.个人取向与社会取向的自我观:概念分析与实征测量[J].美中教育评论,2007,4(2):1-23. 被引量:39
  • 5Zinnbauer B J, Pargament KI, Scott AB. The emerging mean- ings of religiousness and spirituality: Problems and prosp- ects. Journal of Personality, 1999, 67(6): 889-919.
  • 6Ashmos DP, Duchon D. Spirituality at work: A conceptual- ization and measure. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2000, 9:134-145.
  • 7Fry LW. Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 2003, 14(6): 693-727.
  • 8Marques J. HR' s crucial role in the establishment of spiritu-ality in the workplace. The Journal of Academy of Business Cambridge, 2005, 7:27-31.
  • 9Riasudeen S, Prabavathy R. Relationship of workplace spiri- tuality and work attitude in manufacturing organization. Global Management Review, 2011, 5(4): 29-37.
  • 10Harris PR. Embracing spirituality in the workplace: A case study of employees' perceptions of increased job perform- ance. Minneapolis: Capella University, 2010.

引证文献4

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部