期刊文献+

灵活架构水文模型在不同产流区的应用 被引量:23

Application of flexible-structure hydrological models in different runoff generation regions
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 对于给定的流域,选择合适的水文模型进行模拟是水文学研究的难点。选取中国11个典型流域,划分为蓄满产流区、超渗产流区及混合产流区,分别验证4种经典概念性模型与4种灵活架构模型。研究表明:蓄满产流区灵活架构模型难以提高模拟精度,但可以检验模型构件对模拟结果的影响,排除不合实际的模型结构;超渗产流区灵活架构模型可以提高模拟精度,但缺乏系统性,难以完整准确地描绘水文过程。综合而言,灵活架构模型表现不稳定,通用性差,但架设与修改方便,易于确定流域产汇流关键过程,是水文模拟的有效手段。 The choice of an appropriate model to be applied to a given catchment for hydrological simulation is a chal- lenging task in hydrology research. To address this issue, extensive research efforts have been devoted to the use of flexible-structure models in recent years. Four typical conceptual models and four flexible-structure models were ap- plied to eleven Chinese catchments divided into the saturation excess, infiltration excess and mixed runoff generation regions. The results show that, in the saturation excess runoff generation region, it is difficult to improve the simulation accuracy by using the flexible-structure models. However, these models can be used to investigate the effect of model components on the simulation results and remove unreasonable model structures for this region. Although the flexible- structure models are able to produce the improved simulations in the infiltration excess runoff generation region, they present less systematic characteristics and cannot accurately represent full hydrological processes. Generally, the flexi- ble-structure models exhibit unstable performance and poor versatility. However, these models are easy to build and modify, and have contributed to the identification of key processes of the runoff generation and concentration. There- fore, the flexible-structure models can be used as an efficient and robust tool for hydrological simulation.
出处 《水科学进展》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期28-35,共8页 Advances in Water Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(41130639 51179045)~~
关键词 水文模拟 径流 灵活架构模型 固定架构模型 hydrological simulation runoff flexible-structure model fixed-structure model
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1BORAH D K. Hydrologic procedures of storm event watershed models:A comprehensive review and comparison[J].{H}Hydrological Processes,2011,(22):3472-3489.
  • 2VAZE J,POST D A,CHIEW F H S. Conceptual rainfall-runoff model performance with different spatial rainfall inputs[J].{H}JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY,2011,(5):1100-1112.
  • 3PETHERAM C,RUSTOMJI P,CH1EW F H S. Rainfall-runoff modeling in northern Australia:A guide to modeling strategies in the tropics[J].{H}Journal of Hydrology,2012.28-41.
  • 4DUAN Q,SCHAAKE J,ANDREASSIAN V. Model parameter estimation experiment:An overview of science strategy and major results from the second and third workshops[J].{H}Journal of Hydrology,2006,(1):3-17.
  • 5CLARK M P,KAVETSKI D,FENICIA F. Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling[J].{H}Water Resources Research,2011,(9):W09301.
  • 6CLARK M P,SLAYER A G,RUPP D E. Framework for understanding structural errors:A modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models[J].{H}Water Resources Research,2008,(12):W00B02.
  • 7FENICIA F,KAVETSKI D,SAVENIJE H H G. Elements of a flexible approach for conceptual hydrological modeling:1:Motivation and theoretical development[J].{H}Water Resources Research,2011,(11):W11510.
  • 8KAVETSKI D,FENICIA F. Elements of a flexible approach for conceptual hydrological modeling:2:Application and experimental insights[J].{H}Water Resources Research,2011,(11):W1151l.
  • 9EUSER T,WINSEMIUS H C,HRACHOWITZ M. A framework to assess the realism of model structures using hydrological signatures[J].{H}HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES,2013,(5):1893-1912.
  • 10STAUDINGER M,STAHL K,SEIBERT J. Comparison of hydrological model structures based on recession and low flow simulations[J].{H}HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES,2011,(11):3447-3459.

二级参考文献50

  • 1武新宇,程春田,赵鸣雁.基于并行遗传算法的新安江模型参数优化率定方法[J].水利学报,2004,35(11):85-90. 被引量:47
  • 2杨道辉,马光文,刘起方,陶春华,过夏明.基于粒子群优化算法的BP网络模型在径流预测中的应用[J].水力发电学报,2006,25(2):65-68. 被引量:43
  • 3马海波,董增川,张文明,梁忠民.SCE-UA算法在TOPMODEL参数优化中的应用[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2006,34(4):361-365. 被引量:49
  • 4赵人俊 王佩兰.新安江模型参数的分析.水文,1988,18(6):2-8.
  • 5ROSENBROCK H H. An automatic method for finding the greatest or least value of function [ J ]. Computer Journal, 1960, 3 (3) 175-184.
  • 6NELDER J A, MEADE R A. Simplex method for function minimization [Jl. Computer Journal, 1965, 7(4) : 308-313.
  • 7DUAN Q Y, GUPTA V K, SOROOSHIAN S. Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models [ J] Water Resources Research, 1992, 28(4) : 1015-1031.
  • 8CHENG C T, OU C P, CHAU K W. Combining a fuzzy optimal model with a genetic algorithm to solve raulti-objective rainfall-runoff model calibration [ J ]. Journal of Hydrology, 2002, 268 (1/2/3/4) : 72-86.
  • 9VRUGT J A, GUPTA H V, BASTIDAS L A, et al. Effective and efficient algorithm for muhiobjective optimization of hydrologic models [J]. Water Resources Research, 2003, 39(8) : 1214.
  • 10TANG Y, REED P, WAGENER T. How effective and efficient are multiobjective evolutionary algorithms at hydrologic model cali- bration [ J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2005, 2: 2465-2520.

共引文献39

同被引文献219

引证文献23

二级引证文献181

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部