期刊文献+

刚性桩复合地基渗流固结性能分析 被引量:7

Analysis of seepage and consolidation properties of rigid-pile composite foundation
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于饱和砂井渗流固结理论,推导了综合考虑褥垫层、桩、土模量的刚性桩复合地基渗流固结解析解。在ABAQUS中使用Modified Cam-clay模型和孔压单元模拟桩间土体,建立单桩复合地基有限元分析模型。计算结果与某高层结构刚性桩复合地基静载试验吻合较好,验证分析模型的有效性。使用该分析模型,研究褥垫层厚度、模量,桩长对刚性桩复合地基受力及固结变形的影响。结果表明:刚性桩复合地基固结速度远大于天然地基,固结速度随褥垫层模量增大而增大,随井径比减小而增大;结构施工过程中,地基固结沉降已基本完成;褥垫层模量的增大可减小刚性桩复合地基固结沉降,但褥垫层厚度及排水土层厚度的增加都会加大固结沉降。 A consolidation theoretical solution of rigid-pile composite foundation, which takes the modulus of cushion, pile and soil in consideration, was derived on the basis of saturated sand drain well consolidation theory. The FEA model of a single pile composite foundation was established in ABAQUS adopting the Modified Cam-clay constitutive model and pore element to simulate the soil between piles. The calculation fit well with the experimental results, which proved the validity of numerical simulation. The influences of thickness and modulus of cushion, the length of pile on the mechanical and consolidation settlement of rigid-pile composite foundation were further analyzed. The results show that: the consolidation rate of rigid-pile composite foundation is quite faster than natural foundation; the consolidation rate is faster with larger cushion modulus and minor drain diameter ratio; the consolidation is almost finished during the construction process ; the increase of cushion modulus leads to decrease of consolidation settlement, but the increase of thickness of cushion and drainage soil layer leads to the opposite effect.
出处 《建筑结构学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期208-214,共7页 Journal of Building Structures
基金 华南理工大学亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室自主研究课题项目(2011ZA05)
关键词 刚性桩复合地基 褥垫层 饱和砂井 Modified Cam—clay模型 渗流固结解析解 固结沉降 rigid-pile composite foundation cushion saturated sand drain well Modified Cam-clay constitutivemodel theoretical solution of seepage and consolidation consolidation settlement
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Carrillo N. Simple two and three dimensional cases in the theory of consolidation of soils[J].Journal of Mathematical Physics,1942,(01):1-5.
  • 2Barron R A. Consolidation of fine-grained soils by drain wells[J].Transactions of the ASCE,1948,(2346):718-754.
  • 3Hiroshi Yoshikuni,Hirofumi Nakanodo. Consolidation of soils by vertical drain wells with finite permeability[J].SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS,1974,(02):35-46.
  • 4Hansbo S. Consolidation of fine-grained soils by prefabricated drains[A].Rotterdam:CRC Press,1981.677-682.
  • 5Han J,Ye S-L. Simplified method for consolidation rate of stone column reinforced foundations[J].JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING,2001,(07):597-603.
  • 6曾国熙;王铁儒;顾尧章.砂井地基的若干问题[J]岩土工程学报,1981(04):74-81.
  • 7郭彪,韩颖,龚晓南,卢萌盟.考虑横竖向渗流的砂井地基非线性固结分析[J].深圳大学学报(理工版),2010,27(4):459-463. 被引量:7
  • 8郭彪,韩颖,龚晓南,卢萌盟.随时间任意变化荷载下砂井地基固结分析[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2012,43(6):2369-2377. 被引量:10
  • 9谢康和,曾国熙.等应变条件下的砂井地基固结解析理论[J].岩土工程学报,1989,11(2):3-17. 被引量:166
  • 10卢萌盟,谢康和,周国庆,郭彪.不排水桩复合地基固结解析解[J].岩土工程学报,2011,33(4):574-579. 被引量:31

二级参考文献46

  • 1谢康和,周开茂.未打穿竖向排水井地基固结理论[J].岩土工程学报,2006,28(6):679-684. 被引量:24
  • 2TangXW OnitsukaK.双层竖井地基的固结.岩土力学中的数值和解析方法,2001,25:449-465.
  • 3BergadoDT AsakamiH AlfaroMC等.曼谷黏土竖井地基涂抹效应.岩土工程期刊,1991,117(10):1509-1530.
  • 4IndraratnaB RedanaIW.竖井地基涂抹区域试验研究.岩土和环境工程期刊,1998,124(2):180-184.
  • 5SharmaJS XiaoD.竖井地基涂抹区特性的大尺寸室内试验研究.加拿大土工杂志,2000,37(6):1265-1271.
  • 6XIEKH LUMM LIUGM.碎石桩复合地基等应变固结.岩土力学中的数值和解析方法,2009,33:1721-1735.
  • 7LekhaKR KrishnaswamyNR BasakP.随时间变化荷载下砂井地基固结.岩土力学中的数值和解析方法,1998,124(1):91-94.
  • 8lndraratnaB RujikiatkamjomC SathananthanI.竖井地基非线性径向固结.加拿大土工杂志,2005,42:1330-1341.
  • 9Katsuhiko Arai, Hideki Ohta, Keisuke Kojima, et al. Application of back - analysis to several test embankments on soft clay deposits[J ]. Soil and Foundations, 1986,26 (2) : 60 - 72.
  • 10Akio Nakase, Takeshi Xamei,Osamu Kusakabe. Constitutive parameters estimated by plasticity index[J ]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering ASCE,1988,114(7) :844 - 858.

共引文献227

同被引文献70

引证文献7

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部