摘要
我国的人民陪审员制度无论在立法层面还是在司法实践中,均有偏离制度设立初衷之嫌:人民陪审员资格设定过高,陪审员的遴选行政化,陪审制的适用范围不清,当事人缺乏对程序的选择权等,造成实际运作中陪审员"陪而不审"、"合而不议",陪审制形同虚设。因此,有必要降低人民陪审员的资格标准,完善个案陪审员的产生机制,加强陪审员在审判中的地位,使我国的人民陪审员制度发挥应有的作用。
The people ’ s jury system in China is suspected of deviating from the original intention of the system when it was set up whether in legislative level or in judicial practice .Such problems as too high qualification standards of people’s jurors, the administration of selection of jurors ,unclear application scope of jury system ,and the parties’ being lack of option to the program , have caused the jurors ’ “accompanying without examining”, and “gathering without discussion” in judicial practice;the jury system exists in name only .Therefore,it is necessary to reduce the jurors’ qualification standards ,improve the generation mechanism of case jurors ,and strengthen the power of jurors in the trial,in order to make our people ’ s jury system play its due role .
出处
《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》
2014年第1期1-3,42,共4页
Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
关键词
陪审制
人民陪审员
遴选行政化
jury system
people jurors
administration of selection
