期刊文献+

加强型流动树脂修复窝沟龋的临床观察 被引量:13

Clinical evaluation of high-intensive flowable composite in the treatment of pit and fissure caries
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:观察加强型流动树脂修复恒磨牙窝沟龋的临床疗效。方法:选择双侧同名恒磨牙或相邻恒磨牙均已发生窝沟龋的患者85例共170个牙,采用自体对照法,随机选择一侧窝沟龋牙为实验组,对侧或相邻窝沟龋牙为对照组。去腐后实验组用加强型流动树脂Beautifil Flow Plus F03治疗;对照组采用传统光固化复合树脂BeutifilⅡpolymer治疗,治疗后6、12、18个月复查。采用改良的美国公共卫生署评价标准进行疗效评估,统计学分析。结果:2组在治疗后6、12个月,各项复查指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);实验组治疗后18个月充填体完整性、边缘着色的成功率分别为98.78%和97.56%,对照组分别为90.24%和89.02%(P<0.05),在继发龋和术后敏感方面实验组无失败病例,对照组发生2例。结论:加强型流动树脂治疗窝沟龋优于光固化树脂。 AIM: To observe the clinical effects of high-intensive flowable composites in the treatment of pit and fissure caries. METHODS: 170 permanent molars with occlusal pit and fissure caries in 85 patients were in- cluded. After removal of the decayed tissue, the teeth on one side were treated with high-intensive flowable compos- itein Beautifil Flow plus F03 in the experimental group, and the adjacent teeth or contralateral teeth were treated with light-cured composite Beutifil Ⅱ polymer in the control group. The modified USPHS/Ryge criteria was used to evaluate the effects 6, 12 and 18 months after treatment. SPSS12.0 software package was used for statistical analysis. RE- SULTS: There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in each index 6 and 12 months after treatment ( P 〉 0.05 ). 18 months after treatment the filling retention rate in the experimental and control groups was 98.78% and 90.24% ( P 〈 0.05 ), marginal discoloration 97.56% and 89.02% ( P 〈 0.05 ), respectively. No secondary caries and postoperative sensitivity was observed in experimental group, but 2 of each were observed in the control group. CON- CLUSION : High-intensive flowable composite is more effective in the treatment of pit and fissure caries than light-cured composite.
出处 《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第2期109-111,共3页 Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
关键词 窝沟龋 加强型流动树脂 微渗漏 pit and fissure caries high-intensive flowable composite micrdedge
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献13

  • 1史宇,刘鲁川,温秀杰,柴鉴深.几种银汞合金替代材料微渗漏的体外实验研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2004,26(16):1496-1498. 被引量:14
  • 2秦满,夏斌,刘宏胜.流动性充填材料用于预防性树脂充填的实验研究[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2005,19(3):302-305. 被引量:53
  • 3徐美玉.Dyract flow流动复合体与光固化窝沟封闭剂治疗磨牙窝沟龋的临床比较[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2006,22(4):562-563. 被引量:5
  • 4Simonsen JR. Preventive resin restoration ( Ⅰ ). Quintessence Int,1978,9:69 - 76.
  • 5Simonsen JR. Preventive resin restoration ( Ⅱ ). Quintessence Iht,1978, 9: 95 - 102.
  • 6Strassler HE, Goodman, HS. A durable flowable composite resin for preventive resin restorations. Dent - Today. 2002,21:116 - 121.
  • 7Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives.Dent Mater, 1999, 15:128- 137.
  • 8Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, et al. A characterization of first- generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc, 1998,129:567 - 577.
  • 9Estafan AM, Estafan D: Microleakage study of flowable composite resin system. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2000,21:705- 708,710,712,quiz 714.
  • 10Leevailoj C, Cochran MA, Matis BA, et al. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners.Oper Dent, 2001, 26:302-307.

共引文献63

同被引文献116

引证文献13

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部