期刊文献+

唐氏综合征早期筛查中超声测量胎儿颈项透明层质量控制的探讨 被引量:10

Preliminary Study about Ultrasonic Nuchal Translucency Measurement Quality Control in Early Screening of Down's Syndrome
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:对唐氏综合征早期筛查中超声测量胎儿颈项透明层(NT)的质量控制进行探讨。方法:随机抽取四川大学华西第二医院超声科3位医生各300例胎儿NT值,应用英国胎儿基金会推荐的DQASS原理对数据进行分析,与标准曲线比较制成散点图,分析每位医生的偏倚值(bias)、斜率和离散程度。结果:医生1、医生2、医生3的bias分别为-0.29、-0.53、-0.22,3条直线斜率分别为0.0201、0.0117、0.0225,医生1与医生3的直线斜率无明显差异,医生1、医生3与医生2直线斜率有差异。结论:医生1和医生3的测量bias、斜率及离散程度在满意范围内,医生2的数据偏倚较大,需要进一步培训和学习,原因可能与测量时的胎儿体位及测量游标位置有关。 Objective :To evaluate the quality control of ultrasonic nuchal translucency measurement quality control in early screening of down's syndrome. Methods:300 fetus NT results from each of 3 doctors were se- lected randomly. The clinical data were analyzed with DQASS recommended by FMF. The analysis of bias, slope,scatter of every doctor's curve in compare with standard curve were conducted. Results: The bias of three doctors was -0. 29, -0. 53, -0. 22 respectively. The slope of the straight line was 0. 0201,0. 0117, 0.0225 respectively. There was no differences on the slope of the straight line between doctor 1 and 3, howev- er, there was obvious differences between doctor 1,3 and 2 respectively. Conclusions :The bias, slope,scatter of doctor 1 and 3 were under satisfaction, while doctor 2's data showed much more deviations who still need more training and improvements. The reasons of deviations may be the fetus position and cursor location.
作者 田雨 王和
出处 《实用妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期108-110,共3页 Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 唐氏综合征 筛查 胎儿颈项透明层 质量控制 Down's syndrome Screening fetus Nuchal translucency Quality control
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Nicolaides KH,Azar Byme D. Fetal nuchal translucency:ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects in first trimester of pregnancy[J].BMJ:British Medical Journal,1992,(05):867-869.
  • 2Kagan,Chitty L,Byrne D. Effect of deviation of nuchal translucency measurements on the performance of screening for Trisomy 21Pub[J].Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology,2009,(11):657-664.
  • 3Loughna P,Chitty L,Evans T. Chudleigh T(2009)fetal size and dating:charts recommended for clinical obstetric practice[J].Ultrasound,2009,(03):161-167.

同被引文献97

  • 1陈志美,杜珍,王定珺.孕中期NIPT联合血清AFP、free β-hCG及uE3检测在唐氏综合征筛查的临床价值[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2020,0(1):79-80. 被引量:31
  • 2谭蓓蓓,郭婧澜,李友谊,刘俊,陈伯勋.miR-125b-5p对过氧化氢诱导的视网膜神经节细胞损伤的影响及其机制研究[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2020,36(4):414-418. 被引量:2
  • 3端琪,赵小虎,孙莉.孕早期颈项透明层厚度测量在胎儿产前诊断中的应用分析[J].肿瘤影像学,2013,22(1):30-32. 被引量:17
  • 4Nicolaides K H. The 11-13,6 weeks scan[ M]. London: Fetal Medicine Foundation, 2004:71-94.
  • 5Axell R G, Gillett A, Pasupathy D, et al. Accuracy of nuchal translucency measurement depends on equipmentused and its calibration [ J ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2014 ,g4( 1 ) :31-37.
  • 6Whitlow B J, Chatzipapas I K, Economides D L. The effect of fetal neck position on nuchal translucency measurement [J3. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1998,105(8) :872-876.
  • 7Pandya P P, Altman D G, Brizot M L, et al. Repeatability of measurement of fetal nuchal translucency thickness [ J ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 1995,5 (5) :334-337.
  • 8Hertzberg B S, Kliewer M A, Bowie J D, et al. Physi- cian training requirements in sonography: how many cases are needed for competence? [ J ]. Am J Roentgenol, 2000,174 ( 5 ) : 1221-1227.
  • 9Maul H, Scharf A, Baler P, et al. Ultrasound simula- tors: experience with the SonoTrainer and comparative re- view of other training systems [ J ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gy- necol, 2004,24 ( 5 ) : 581-585.
  • 10Kagan K O, Wright D, Etchegaray A, et al. Effect of de- viation of nuchal translucency measurements on the per- formance of screening for trisomy 21 [ J]. Ultrasound Ob- stet Gynecol, 2009,33 (6) :657-664.

引证文献10

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部