摘要
目的对比探讨内镜与显微镜下鼓膜大穿孔软骨岛-软骨膜成形术的异同。方法慢性化脓性中耳炎静止期大穿孔患者30例,内镜下修补15例,显微镜下修补15例。结果鼓膜形态:内镜组愈合良好,显微镜组失败3例。听力:内镜组有效10例,显效4例,无效1例;显微镜组有效12例,显效1例,无效2例。结论鼓膜大穿孔内镜下修补具有损伤小、省时等特点,易于在基层医院开展。
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of big tympamc membrane pertoratlon repalrea wlm cartuage island-perichondrium under endoscopy or microscope. Methods Thirty patients with big tympanic membrane perfora- tion underwent repair under endoscopy or microscope between 2010 and 2012. The clinic data were reviewed. Results Among the patients, 15 cases were repaired by endoscopy and the other 15 cases were repaired by microscope. After follow-up for 3 months, the cure rate in endoscope group was 100%, with 10 normal, 4 improved, but 1 unchanged hearing. The cure rate in the microscope group was 80%, with 12 normal, 1 improved and 2 unchanged hearing. Con- clusion Repair of big tympanic membrane perforation under endoscopy is easy and time-saving, and the injury is
出处
《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》
CAS
2014年第1期8-9,共2页
Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University
关键词
鼓膜修补
内镜
显微镜
软骨岛一软骨膜
Repair of tympanic membrane perforation
Endoscope
Microscope
Cartilage island-perichondrium
