期刊文献+

Lenstar、Pentacam与Sirius测量白内障患者眼前节生物参数的比较 被引量:12

Comparison of anterior ocular segment measurements for cataracts using Lenstar, Pentacam and Sirius
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评估新型光学低相干反射仪Lenstar、Pentacam眼前节综合分析系统和眼前节生物测量仪Sirius测量白内障患者中央角膜厚度(CCT)、前房深度(ACD)、角膜曲率(Km)的差异性与一致性,为临床使用提供依据.方法 前瞻性对照研究.同一观测者分别应用Lenstar 、Pentacam和Sirius 测量40例(40眼)白内障患者的CCT、角膜内皮到晶状体前表面的ACD (ACDendo)、角膜上皮到晶状体前表面的ACD(ACDepi)和Km,眼别的选择采用随机方式.对3种仪器测量的以上指标比较采用重复测量方差分析,进一步用Bonferroni法两两比较仪器间的差异,一致性比较采用Bland-Altman统计分析法.结果 Lenstar、Pentacam和Sirius测量CCT的平均值分别为(528.18±29.12)μm、(533.21±27.02)μm和(534.48±26.15) μm,ACDendo分别为(2.54±0.41)mm、(2.54±0.43)mm和(2.57±0.43)mm,ACDepi分别为(3.07±0.41)mm、(3.08 ±0.42) mm和(3.10±0.43)mm,差异均有统计学意义(F=11.641、9.961、12.539,P<0.01),Km值分别为(44.05±1.69)D、(43.99±1.65)D、(43.93±1.63)D,差异有统计学意义(F=4.186,P<0.05).3种仪器测量CCT、ACDendo、ACDepi、Km的95%一致性区间(LoA)较小,其上下限最大的绝对值分别为26.41 μm、0.12 mm、0.12 mm和0.61 D,一致性好.结论 Lenstar、Pentacam和Sirius测量白内障患者中央角膜厚度、前房深度、角膜曲率具有良好的一致性,为临床白内障患者眼前节参数的测量提供了新的选择. Objective To assess the differences and agreements among measurements of cataractous eyes using Lenstar LS900 biometer,Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug photography and a Sirius Scheimpflug-Placido disc topographer.The following measurements were taken:central corneal thickness (CCT),anterior chamber depth from the corneal endothelium to the anterior lens capsule (ACDendo),anterior chamber depth from the corneal epithelium to the anterior lens capsule (ACDepi) and mean keratometry (Kin).Methods In this prospective clinical study,CCT,ACD (including ACDendo and ACDepi) and the Km of 40 eyes were randomly obtained by Lenstar,Pentacam and Sirius.All measurements included the 3 methods which were compared using a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA),with a Bonferroni multiple comparison correction.Bland-Altman analyses were used to evaluate the agreement between the devices.Results The mean CCTs obtained by Lenstar,Pentacam and Sirius were 528.18±29.12 μm,533.21±27.02 μm and 534.48±26.15 μm,respectively.The mean ACDendo obtained by Lenstar,Pentacam and Sirius were 2.54±0.41 mm,2.54±0.43 mm and 2.57±0.43 mm,respectively.The mean ACDepi obtained by Lenstar,Pentacam and Sirius were 3.07±0.41 mm,3.08±0.42 mm and 3.10±0.43 mm,respectively.The mean Km obtained by Lenstar,Pentacam and Sirius were 44.05±1.69 D,43.99±1.65 D and 43.93±1.63 D,respectively.There were significant differences among the results of these three methods in CCT (F=11.641,P〈0.01),ACDendo (F=9.961,P〈0.01),ACDepi (F=12.539,P〈0.01),and Km (F=4.186,P〈0.05).The Bland-Altman plot analyses showed that the three devices had comparable results for CCT,ACD and Km.For the maximum absolute values of 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were 26.41 μm,0.12 mm,0.12 mm and 0.61 D respectively.Conclusion Lenstar,Pentacam and Sirius demonstrated high agreement for CCT,ACD and corneal curvature measurements in cataractous eyes.
机构地区 [
出处 《中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志》 CAS 2014年第1期30-35,共6页 Chinese Journal Of Optometry Ophthalmology And Visual Science
基金 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目,浙江省教育厅科研项目,温州市科技局资助项目
关键词 中央角膜厚度 前房深度 角膜曲率 一致性 Lenstar Pentacam Sirius Lenstar Pentacam Sirius Central corneal thickness Anterior chamber depth Corneal curvature Agreement
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Lee AC, Qazi MA, Pepose JS. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation[J]. Cur Opin Ophthahnol, 2008,19 : 13-17.
  • 2Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review[J]. Acta ophthalmol Scand,2007,85:472-485.
  • 3Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Shah S, et al. A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients[J]. Br J Ophthalmol,2009,93:949-953.
  • 4De la Parra-Colin P, Garza-Leon M, Barrientos-Gutierrez T. Repeatability and comparability of anterior segment biometry obtained by the Sirius and the Pentacam analyzers[J]. Int Ophthalmol, 2013.
  • 5Savini G, Carbonelli M, Sbreglia A, et al. Comparison of anterior segment measurements by 3 Scheimpflug tomographers and 1 Placido corneal topographer[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011,37 : 1679-1685.
  • 6Lattimore MR, Jr., Kaupp S, Schallhorn S, et al. Orbscan pachymetry: implications of a repeated measures and diurnal variation analysis[J]. Ophthalmology,1999,106:977-981.
  • 7Read SA, Collins MJ. Diurnal variation of corneal shape and thickness[J]. Optom Vis Sci,2009,86 : 170-180.
  • 8Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement[J]. Lancet, 1986, 1:307-310.
  • 9Su PF, Lo AY; Hu CY, et al. Anterior chamber depth measurement in phakic and pseudophakic eyes[J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2008,85 : 1193-1200.
  • 10Kawana K, Tokunaga T, Miyata K, et al. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, non-contact specular microscopy, and ultrasonic pachymetry in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Br J Ophthalmol,2004, 88:466-468.

同被引文献148

  • 1项奕,彭斌,邢怡桥.IOL Master联合A超对3,4级核晶状体进行人工晶状体度数测量[J].武汉大学学报(医学版),2004,25(5):574-576. 被引量:6
  • 2王毓林,杨军,王毓琴,罗莉霞,何明光,刘奕志.应用PENTACAM三维眼前段分析仪对人工晶状体在眼内稳定性的研究[J].眼科学报,2006,22(2):119-124. 被引量:12
  • 3祁媛媛,张丰菊.光学相干生物测量仪的临床应用[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2007,25(8):809-812. 被引量:9
  • 4Holzer MP,Mamusa M,Auffarth GU.Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyser for biometric measurements[J].Br J Ophthalmol,2009,93(6):807-810.
  • 5Cruysberg LPJ,Doors M,Verbakel F,et al.Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900non-contact biometer[J].Br J Ophthalmol,2010,94(1):106-110.
  • 6Jasvinder S,Khang TF,Sarinder KK,et al.Agreement analysis of LENSTAR with other techniques of biometry[J].Eye(Lond),2011,25(6):717-724.
  • 7Lam AK,Chan R,Pang PC.The repeatability and accuracy of axial length and anterior chamber depth measurements from the IOLMaster[J].Ophthalmic Physiol Opt,2001,21(6):477-483.
  • 8Buckhurst PJ,Wolffsohn JS,Shah S,et al.A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients[J].Br J Opthalmal,2009,93(7):949-953.
  • 9El Chehab H,Giraud JM,Le Corre A,et al.Comparison between Lenstar LS900non-contact biometry and Ocuscan RXP contact biometry for task delegation[J].J Fr Ophtalmol,2011,34(3):175-180.
  • 10Roncevic MB,Busic M,Cima I,et al.Comparison of optical low coherence reflectometry and applanation ultrasound biometry on intraocular lens power calculation[J].Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol,2011,249(1):69-75.

引证文献12

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部