摘要
开放审稿本质上是作者与审稿人身份公开。目前对于开放审稿的确切定义和实施方式学界尚未达成共识。开放审稿最大的优势就是为学术交流提供了一个新的平台,并有助于增强审稿人责任感和维护学术公正。技术仅是开放审稿的一种手段,不应成为其制约因素。开放审稿面临的最大挑战是能否被学术界认可与接受。
Open peer review is essentially the disclosure of the authors＇ and reviewers＇ identities. Among the existing models of open peer review, the openness characteristics are different. However, a consensus around an understanding of definitions and models of open review has not been developed yet among scholarly and publishing communities. The most important benefit of open peer review is to strengthen academic communication. What＇s more, open peer review may help to build up reviewers＇ accountability and achieve social justice. Technology is merely a means to conduct open peer review, and should not become a restrictive factor of open peer review. Open peer review first needs to be considered and accepted by scholarly communities.
出处
《编辑学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第1期19-22,共4页
Acta Editologica
关键词
同行评议
开放审稿
学术出版
学术交流
peer review
open peer review
scholarly publishing
academic communication
