期刊文献+

磁共振场强及序列选择对金属植入物伪影大小影响探讨 被引量:20

Evaluation of the size of metallic implantation artifacts in different MRI field strength and sequences
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较不同场强不同序列伪影的差异。方法制作钛合金水模,分别在1.5 T和3.0 T MRI扫描仪上采用矢状位快速自旋回波(TSE)-T1、TSE-T2、TSE的短反转时间的反转恢复(STIR)的脂肪抑制、TSE的频率选择饱和法(FS)抑制、梯度回波序列(GRE)/快速小角度激发(FLASH)、扩散加权成像(DWI)等常用序列扫描。分析扫描得到图像伪影特点及进行伪影大小测量。结果GRE/FLASH序列图像和DWI图像伪影最大,FS抑制序列得到图像伪影比STIR序列图像伪影大,各序列伪影形状也有差别。在不同场强下相同类型序列扫描伪影也不同,高场强伪影明显大于低场强伪影。同一场强不同序列伪影大小不同,同一类型序列3.0 T MRI图像伪影比1.5 T MRI图像伪影要大,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论可以通过场强选择、序列的选择来减少金属植入物磁共振扫描带来的伪影。 Objective To compare the variation of metallic implantation artifacts in different magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)field strength and sequences.Methods Titanium water phantom was designed for different sequence scanning under 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI.The characteristics of the scanned image artifacts were analyzed and the size of the artifact was measured.Results The fast low angle shot(FLASH)image sequences and diffusion weighted imaging(DWI)image artifacts were the largest,the artifacts of fat suppression sequence image by frequency-selective saturation(FS)was larger than that of short T1 inversion recovery(STIR),and the artifact shapes had differences.At the same field strength,the artifacts changed with different sequences,the image artifacts of 3.0 T MRI were larger than that of 1.5 T MRI on the same type sequence,and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05).Conclusion It is demonstrated that the selection of field strength and sequence could be used to reduce artifacts from the scanning of metallic implants.
出处 《生物医学工程与临床》 CAS 2014年第1期5-9,共5页 Biomedical Engineering and Clinical Medicine
基金 江苏高校优势学科建设工程基金资助(JX10231801)
关键词 金属植入物 伪影 磁共振成像(MRI) 磁场强度 metallic implants artifacts magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) magnetic field strength
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Ahmed M, Modic MT. Neck and low back pain: neuroimaging[J]. Neurol Clin, 2007, 25(2): 439-471.
  • 2Cooper HJ, Ranawat AS, Potter HG, et 01. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and management of hip pain after total hip arthroplasty[J].J Arthroplasty, 2009, 24(5): 661-667.
  • 3Hirasawa Y, Bashir W A, Smith FW, et 01. Postural changes of the dural sac in the lumbar spines of asymptomatic individuals usi?ng positional stand-up magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Spine(p?hila Pa 1976),2007,32(4): EI36-E140.
  • 4ASTM F2052-06el A. Standard test method for measurement of magnetically induced displacement force on medical devices in the magnetic resonance environment[S]. West Conshohocken. P A: ASTM International, 2006.
  • 5Harris CA, White LM. Metal artifact reduction in musculoskelet?al magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2006, 37(3): 349-359.
  • 6Sekhon LH, Duggal N, LynchJ J, et 01. Magnetic resonance imag?ing clarity of the Bryan, Prodisc-C, Prestige LP, and PCM cervi?cal arthroplasty devices[J]. Spine (phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32(6): 673-680.
  • 7Modic MT, Obuchowski NA, RossJS, et 01. Acute low back pain and radiculopatby: MR imaging findings and their prognostic role and effect on outcome[J]. Radiology, 2005, 237(2): 597-604.
  • 8Neal CJ, Rosner MK, Kuklo TR. Magnetic resonance imaging e?valuation of adjacent segments after disc arthroplasty[J].J Neur?osurg Spine, 2005, 3(5): 342-347.
  • 9葛丽娟,林志凯,邓君,等.医用磁共振设备质量控制信号值与成像液硫酸铜浓度的变化关系研究[J].中华现代影像学杂志,2009,6(3):129-134.
  • 10Neal CJ, Rosner MK, Kuklo TR. Magnetic resonance imaging e?valuation of adjacent segments after disc arthroplasty[J].J Neur?osurg Spine, 2005, 3(5):342-347.

二级参考文献33

  • 1上官景俊,徐文坚.MR脂肪抑制技术在肌肉骨骼系统的临床应用进展[J].医学影像学杂志,2005,15(6):517-519. 被引量:2
  • 2顾欣 ,袁滨 ,袁飞 ,冯凯琳 ,龙淼淼 .3.0T磁共振SENSE及SPAIR技术在腹部扫描中的优势及应用[J].医疗卫生装备,2005,26(9):51-52. 被引量:6
  • 3盛华强,赵斌.强直性脊柱炎早期骶髂关节病变的MRI研究[J].医学影像学杂志,2007,17(2):203-205. 被引量:9
  • 4[1]Ganapathi M,Joseph G,Savage R,et al.MRI susceptibility artefacts related to scaphoid screws:the effect of screw type,screw orientation and imaging parameters[J].J Hand Surg Br,2002,27(2):165-170.
  • 5[2]Laskin RS.An oxidized Zr ceramic surfaced femoral component for total knee arthroplasty[J].Clin Orthop Ralat Res,2003,(416):191-196.
  • 6[3]Rsphael B,Halms AH,Wu JS,et al.MRI comparison of periprosthetic structures around zirconium knee proetheses and cobalt chrome prostheses[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol,2006,186(6):1771-1777.
  • 7[4]Ries MD,Salehi A,Widding K,et al.Polyethylene wear performance of oxidized zirconium and cebalt-chromium knee components under abrasive conditions[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2002,84A Suppl 2:129-135.
  • 8[5]Guermazi A,Miaux Y,Zaim S,et al.Metallic artefacts in MR imaging:effects of main field orientation and strength[J].Clin Radiol,2003,58(4):322-328.
  • 9[6]Matsuura H,Inoue T,Ogasawara K,et al.Quantitative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility artifacts caused by neurosurgical biomaterials:comparison of 0.5,1.5,and 3.0 Tesla magnetic fields[J].Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo),2005,45 (8):395-398.
  • 10[7]Olsrud J,Latt J,Brockstedt S,et al.Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by aneurysm clips and shunt valves:dependence on field strength (1.5 and 3 T) and imaging parameters[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2005,22(3):433-437.

共引文献20

同被引文献137

引证文献20

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部