期刊文献+

颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗高龄颈动脉狭窄患者的安全性和有效性分析 被引量:11

Analysis on Effectiveness and Safety of The Carotid Endarterectomy in Treating Elderly Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析颈动脉内膜剥脱术(cEA)治疗高龄(≥75岁)颅外段颈动脉狭窄患者的疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析北京协和医院血管外科2009年10月至2012年10月期间行CEA治疗的312例颈动脉狭窄患者的临床资料,分析CEA治疗高龄颈动脉狭窄患者的危险因素,探讨围手术期并发症的预防措施。结果本研究共纳入39例患者,所有手术过程顺利,随访时间为(22.18±8.71)个月。其中男33例(84.6%),女6例(15.4%);中位年龄77岁(75~82岁);双侧病变患者11例(28.2%),无症状患者7例(17.9%);共施行39例次CEA,22例次(56.4%)采用颈动脉补片;16例次(41.0%)使用转流管;住院时间(17.38±5.39)d。1例患者(2.6%)术后第2天出现脑过度灌注综合征,1例患者(2.6%)术后15个月出现手术侧再狭窄,无围手术期死亡病例。结论在严格掌握手术适应证情况下,CEA是治疗高龄颈动脉狭窄患者安全而有效的方法。 Objective To summarize the experience in treating the elderly patients (≥ 75 years old) with carotid artery stenosis, and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods The datum of 312 cases with carotid artery stenosis and underwent the CEA in the vascular surgery department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital from October 2009 to October 2012 were retrospectively analized. The risk factors of the CEA in treating the elderly patients were analized, and the measures to prevent perioperative complications were discussed. Results Thirty-nine cases were brought into the research. The mean follow-up was (22. 18±8.71) months. Thirty-three cases (84. 6%) were male and 6 cases (15.4%) were female. The median age was 77 years old (75-82 years old). Eleven cases (28. 2%) were with bilateral lesions, and 7 cases (17.9%) were asymptomatic. A total of 39 CEA procedures were successfully performed, 22 artificial vascular patches (56. 4%) and 16 shunts (41.0%) were used. The mean average hospital stay was (17.38±5.39) days. One case showed cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome in 2th day after operation, another 1 case was found ipsilateral restenosis in 15th month after operation. Conclusion CEA is a safe and effective measure in treating the elderly patients with carotid artery stenosis, if the the indications of surgery is performed strictly.
出处 《中国普外基础与临床杂志》 CAS 2014年第1期60-64,共5页 Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics In General Surgery
关键词 颈动脉狭窄 动脉内膜剥脱术 颈动脉 高龄 并发症 危险因素 Carotid artery stenosis Endarterectomy Carotid artery Advanced age Complication Risk factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献302

  • 1王桂红,姜卫剑,王拥军.脑高灌注综合征的研究进展[J].中国卒中杂志,2006,1(5):378-382. 被引量:26
  • 2刘长建,黄佃,王炜,刘晨,冉峰.颈动脉外翻内膜剥脱术治疗颈动脉硬化狭窄[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(7):409-411. 被引量:9
  • 3The European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group. Risk of stroke in the distribution of an asymptomatic carotid artery. Lancet, 1995, 345: 209-212.
  • 4Moore WS, Barnett HJ, Beehe HG, et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the ad hoc committee. Stroke, 1995, 26: 188-201.
  • 5Setacci C, Cremonesi A. SPACE and EVA-3s Trials: The need of standards for carotid stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2007, 33: 48-49.
  • 6AHCPR. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Acute pain maragement: operative on medical procedures and trauma. [107]. Rockville MD: AHCPR, 1993.
  • 7european Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative group. Randomised trial of endarerectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet, 1998, 351: 1379-1387.
  • 8Ferguson GG, Eliasziw M, Barr HW, et al. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: Surgical results in 1415 patients. Stroke, 1999, 30:1751-1758.
  • 9Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Chitwood RW, et al. Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. J Vase Surg, 1993, 17: 152-159.
  • 10Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, et al; Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists' Collaboration. Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet, 2003, 361: 107-116.

共引文献108

同被引文献66

  • 1王飞.颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗症状性颈动脉狭窄的几个重要问题[J].外科研究与新技术,2012,1(1):23-26. 被引量:6
  • 2韩伟,符伟国,王玉琦,郭大乔.高危颈动脉狭窄患者的外科治疗(附24例报告)[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2004,11(4):304-306. 被引量:2
  • 3耿志宇,许幸.瑞芬太尼的临床药理学[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),2004,25(4):203-206. 被引量:208
  • 4Yepes Temio MJ, Lillo Cuevas M. Anesthesia for carotidendarterectomy: a review [J]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 2011, 58(1): 34-41.
  • 5Samanta S, Samanta S, Panda N, et al. A unique anesthesia approach for carotid endarterectomy: combination of general and regional anesthesia [J], Saudi J Anaesth, 2014, 8(2): 290-293.
  • 6Guay J, Kopp S. Cerebral monitors versus regional anesthe- sia to detect cerebral ischemia in patients undergoing caro- tid endarterectomy: ameta-analysis [J]. Can J Anaesth, 2013, 60(3): 266-279.
  • 7Bouri S, Thapar A, Shalhoub J, et al. Hypertension and the post- carotid endarterectomy cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. Eur l Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2011, 41(2): 229-237.
  • 8Xue GB, Yu BX, Wang XZ, et al. Stroke in urban and rural areas of China. Chin MedJ (Engl), 1991, 104(8): 697-704.
  • 9Klijn CJ, KappeUe LJ, Tulleken CA, et al. Symptomatic carotid artery occlusion. A reappraisal of hemodynamic factors. Stroke, 1997, 28(10): 2084-2093.
  • 10Kuroda S, Houkin K, Kamiyama H, et al. Long-term prognosis of medically treated patients with internal carotid or middle cerebral artery occlusion: can acetazolamide test predict it?. Stroke, 2001, 32(9): 2110-2116.

引证文献11

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部