期刊文献+

辅助生殖技术的经济学研究进展 被引量:1

Economic Consideration of the Assisted Reproductive Technology
暂未订购
导出
摘要 分析总结近5年国内外有关辅助生殖技术在经济学领域的研究进展。近年国外学者对辅助生殖技术的经济学研究分析主要分为以下4个方面:不同治疗方案的经济学分析、不同促排卵药物的成本-效果比较、不同胚胎移植方案的经济学分析、特殊类型患者的治疗方案的经济学分析。提出在对该领域的经济学评价进行研究时,对于总费用统计(包括费用统计的分类、费用统计时间)以及活产率计算等的问题。探讨总结不同分析方法对于指导全面分析辅助生殖技术的经济效益,进一步优化医疗资源配置、指导临床选择优化的治疗方案、节约社会成本、减少患者医疗负担等方面及为国内学者研究该领域的相关经济学评价提供参考。 The research progress on the economic evaluation of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in last 5 years was summarized. Those analysis of ART economics included four main aspects :the economic analysis of different treatment protocols,the cost-effectiveness analysis of different ovulation-inducting drugs,the economic analysis of different embryo transfer program, and the economic analysis of special patients. It was suggested that the statistic evaluation of total cost,including those classified costs and the duration of ART treatment, and the live birth rate should be noticed when the economic effectiveness of ART were evaluated. It is useful for our scientists to evaluate ART by economics analysis. Meanwhile,those economics analyses were also helpful for us to evaluate ART economic effectiveness ,to improve the medical resource allocation, to choose the optimized treatment protocol, to save social cost and reduce the medical burden for patients.
作者 陈潇 李红
出处 《国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志》 CAS 2014年第1期48-51,共4页 Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning
关键词 生殖技术 辅助 卫生服务 经济学 医学 费用效益分析 Reproductive techniques, assisted Health services Economics, medical Cost-benefit analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1张吴华.中国不孕不育现状堪忧[N].健康报,2009-08-26.
  • 2季静娟,骆丽华,童先宏,栾红兵,金仁桃,付应云,郑圣霞,刘雨生.微刺激方案治疗卵巢低反应IVF周期的疗效和经济学评价[J].生殖与避孕,2009,29(11):768-771. 被引量:10
  • 3倪郝,陈雷宁,李红,邱卓琳,华芮,高瑞花,谭洪川,贺玲,全松.基础窦卵泡数与高生育年龄患者IVF/ICSI-ET结局的关系及经济学评价[J].实用妇产科杂志,2012,28(2):124-127. 被引量:4
  • 4Moolenaar LM, Broekmans FJ, van Disseldorp 1. et al. Cost effectiveness of ovarian reserve testing in in vitro fertilization: a Markov decision-analytic model[J]. Fertil Steril,2011 ,96 (4): 889-894.
  • 5van Tilborg TC, Eijkemans MJ, LavenJS, et al. The OPTIMIST study: optimisation of cost effectiveness through individualised FSH stimulation dosages for IVF treatment. A randomised controlled trial[J]. BMC Womens Health,2012,12:29.
  • 6Polinder S ,Heijnen EM, Macklon NS, et al. Cost -effectiveness of a mild compared with a standard strategy for IVF: a randomized comparison using cumulative term live birth as the primary endpoint[J]. Hum Reprod,2008,23(2) :316-323.
  • 7Custers 1M, van Rumste MM, van der SteegJW, et al. Lnng -term outcome in couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis initially randomized between expectant management and immediate treatment[J]. Hum Reprod,2012,27 ( 2) : 444-450.
  • 8Noriega-Portella L,Noriega-Hoces L,Delgado A,et al. Effect of letrozole at 2.5 mg or 5.0 mg/day on ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins in women undergoing intrauterine insemination U]. Fertil Steril, 2008,90(5): 1818-1825.
  • 9Mukherjee S,Sharma S,Chakravarty BN. Letrozole in a low-cost in vitro fertilization protocol in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles for male factor infertility: A randomized controlled trial[J].J Hum Reprod Sci,2012,5(2): 170-174.
  • 10Fiddelers AA, SeverensJL, Dirksen CD, et al. Economic evaluations of single- versus double-embryo transfer in IVF[J]. Hum Reprod Update ,2007 .n: 1) :5-13.

二级参考文献29

  • 1徐千花,曹云霞,魏兆莲,丛林,章志国.不同促排卵方法在卵巢储备功能下降患者中的应用[J].生殖与避孕,2009,29(1):51-54. 被引量:29
  • 2傅薇,韩金兰.IVF超促排卵过程中对卵巢反应性的预测[J].生殖与避孕,2004,24(4):236-239. 被引量:5
  • 3刘嘉茵.微刺激方案治疗卵巢低反应IVF周期[J].实用妇产科杂志,2007,23(3):134-135. 被引量:20
  • 4王吉耀 见:林果为 沈福民 主编.临床经济学评价[A].见:林果为,沈福民,主编.现代临床流行病学:第1版[C].上海:复旦大学出版社.上海医科大学出版社,2000.126—139.
  • 5Lloyd A, Kennedy R, Hutchinson J, et al. Economic evaluation of highly purified menotropin compared with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril, 2003, 80(5): 1108-13.
  • 6Al-Inany HG, Abou-Setta AM, Aboulghar MA, et al. HMG versus rFSH for ovulation induction in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on the results of a recent meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006, 12(2):163-9.
  • 7Keay SD, Liversedge NH, Mathur RS, et al. Assisted conception following poor ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation.Br J Obstet Gynecol, 1997, 104(5): 521-7.
  • 8Baart EB, Martini E, Eijkemans MJ, et al. Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod, 2007, 22(4):980-8.
  • 9Stadtmauer L, Ditkoff E C, Session D, et al. High dosages of gonadotropins are associated with poor pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril, 1994, 61(6):1058-64.
  • 10Weghofer A, Margreiter M, Bassim S, et al. Minimal stimulation using recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in women of advanced age. Fertil Steril, 2004, 81(4): 1002-6.

共引文献12

同被引文献14

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部